Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 29 of 29
  1. #26
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    This is what you said in this very same thread. You may not be "forcing" your beliefs on anyone, but calling people pussies just because they don't object to building a mosque is ridiculous. And don't you dare say that you weren't implying that, because it's obvious the connection you're drawing here.
    It was fairly clear to me that CC was calling people who complain about other people complaining about the so-called GZM, pussies.

    It's complaint-complainers like you and me he singles out for derision, not clueless bystanders. (Your spontaneous outburst of clueless-bystander advocacy did give me a chuckle though. )

  2. #27
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2010/10...-off/?iref=NS1"The Cons ution and Bill of Rights exists to protect unpopular ideas."
    You'll have to elaborate on the meaning of the terms "protect" and "ideas."

    One amendment to the Cons ution, the 1st, protects unpopular speech. But, there's more to the do ent than that.

    The Cons ution (including amendments) was written to establish the framework of, and rules under which, our federal government is to be operated, specifically enumerating its obligations and responsibilities; as well as the inviolate rights enjoyed by its citizens.

    If someone has the "idea" to overthrow the government and ins ute a new form of rule, I'm not sure the Cons ution would "protect" that idea.

    Exactly what have Beck, et. al., done to "endanger" unpopular "ideas," to the point they need "protecting" by the Cons ution?

  3. #28
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    The nature of controversy solicits the protection of law when informal adjustments are impracticable, or one/both parties are pussies.

  4. #29
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    3,009
    maybe not the right thread for this, but I saw this ground zero mosque debate, the debt debate, and started thinking... shouldnt you guys be putting mosques up everywhere? think about it, you get so many benefits:

    1) automagically win the tolerance argument
    2) dissuade terrorist attacks, and give them their own medicine (muslim shield!)
    3) save a lot of money on defense/espionage/intelligence

    its a win/win/win situation, I cant fathom any reason NOT to do it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •