Reply With Quote
Again, was this guys medical attention delayed?
Why can't you liberals acknowledge and respond to a specific point?
If you actually read what I wrote, I attributed the death (and so did the local papers) to the delay of medical attention. The delay was because of the motorcade."Peter Kendall Gunderson, 59, seemingly failed to notice that rush-hour traffic ahead of him was slowing as he maneuvered a 2000 Yamaha motorcycle toward the 33rd Avenue overpass just after 5:50 p.m."
Donorcycle. Darwin candidate. Since when do you not pay attention to traffic while you're in a car, to say nothing of a motorcycle?
Massive WC fail here. He ran into the back of a car. His own damn fault.
Also, since when does a 59 year old own a 2000 Yahama? Wtf?
Again, was this guys medical attention delayed?
Why can't you liberals acknowledge and respond to a specific point?
He died because of a fiery motorcycle crash into the back end of a camaro. There's no guarantee he would have made it even had the ambulance been there seconds after the crash.
If you actually read what you wrote, I repsonsed with semi-rhetorical questions to these specific points/questions:
such a thing basically did happen.
the story was posted by the conservative media.
I don't recall a liberal response and apparently you don't either.
You are terrible at trolling.
This entire thread, in terms of the OP's le, and concept, is so incredulously indicative of mental re ation that I am suddenly afraid WC is the most successful troll in ST, and maybe internet history.
But not because medical attention was delayed.
Wow...
If I have mental re ation, what would you call the majority of posters here who are worse than me?
what exactly were the injuries to this motorcycle rider?
what is the exact amount of time needed to get a man from the scene of this particular accident to the hospital with these particular injuries to save him from dying?
majority?
you are a self admitted bipolar.
run with it.....and entertain us.
Oh, he killed someone...well, seeing he is a man in power, I predict only probation.
I'd call them by their names: DarrinS and Yonivore.
Pre- s?
You're obviously intelligent, but sometimes you say really unintentionally hilarious stuff, WC.
I mean, come on, you even admitted you weren't really serious with this thread, yet you're defending it in places.
LAWL!!!!!!!!!!!111 HE WERKS FOR A LIVING!
ROTFLMFAO
LAWL!!!!!!!!!!!111 HE WERKS FOR A LIVING!
ROTFLMFAO
No dammit, to the scene. There was no medical attention in time because of the motorcade.
the crash happened Wednesday at 6p.m. and he was pronounced dead on Thursday morning, dammit.
Exactly what medical attention was he denied that could have saved his life?
What is the specific time needed to get to a person with these types of injuries?
When an ambulance is delayed to the scene of a serious accident, the likelihood of survival diminishes. Just that simple. If you cannot understand that simple concept, then I give up.
We call that situation "Unfortunate cir stances", not "Obama's fault".
If you reread my OP, does it really come across as me blaming him? I was pointing out liberal absurdity by doing the same, only I never insistent it was Obama's fault. Yes, it's an unfortunate cir stance. I implied in a later post, that if a man died under the same cir stances for a Bush motorcade, the liberals would be all over him killing a man.
Do you disagree it would have been treated differently for a different president?
Now don't go back to that other example cited. He didn't have the same delayed ambulance to the scene.
No, liberals would not call/ imply bush is a killer in this scenerio..
OK, we agree our opinions differ here.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions