Reply With Quote
It was a small bug left from beta-testing. There, I fixed it:
- (void)initVote
{
[self generateBallot];
// [self autoCheckReid];
[self displayBallot];
}
She never directly stated he was to begin with so there was nothing to retract.
This has been cleared up already. Do you need someone to gtfy?
It was a small bug left from beta-testing. There, I fixed it:
- (void)initVote
{
[self generateBallot];
// [self autoCheckReid];
[self displayBallot];
}
Really? You still stuck on stupid?
Not at all. If you recall, the matter is settled for me because of the old Hawaiian newspaper listing births.
His grandmother made that claim. It is one reason why people are so set in the belief he was born there.
Has she ever retracted her statement?
Hawaiin officials have confirmed that his birth certificate is legit.
She made no such claim. She was not there at the delivery.His grandmother made that claim. It is one reason why people are so set in the belief he was born there.
Have you listened to the full tape of the conversation in question?Has she ever retracted her statement?
I thought I have. If I missed something, link please.
OK, not surprising. She probable meant her son, not her grandson at first until she realized what was happening. After-all, he did keep saying son at first, not grandson.
I never said otherwise.
you mentioned old Hawaiian newspaper listing births settled the matter for you.
instead of being coy, you should just get to the point so I don't have to guess if you are trolling or being stupid.
Go back to when I explained my remark. I said:
I never said I believed it.Not at all. If you recall, the matter is settled for me because of the old Hawaiian newspaper listing births.
His grandmother made that claim. It is one reason why people are so set in the belief he was born there.
Has she ever retracted her statement?
It would help if you didn't interject your own bias of me into that you think I said.
I don't have any bias towards you. I don't really give a flip about you one way or the other. I'm simply responding to what you said.
If the matter is settled for you, then you should have no questions whether or not Obama's grammy said he was born in Kenya or not.
You had a question. I answered it. Pretty simple.
If there is something else you are trying to get at here, then spit it out.
'People so set'?
Who are these 'people', other than Crookskanks?
My God.
I was pointing out what other people think. Why is that difficult to comprehend?
http://people-press.org/report/645/"A new national survey by the Pew Research Center finds that nearly one-in-five Americans (18 percent) now say Obama is a Muslim, up from 11 percent in March 2009. Only about one-third of adults (34 percent) say Obama is a Christian, down sharply from 48 percent in 2009. Fully 43% say they do not know what Obama's religion is."
Ah, yes the venerable "some say."
(Gotta have a hoss to pull that dungcart.)
The Obama birthers are stuck knee deep in the left-right paradigm. The left who think that voter fraud stems only from the right are up to their eyeballs in delusion.
Both "sides" fail to address paperless voting. Convenient STALE conversation to hide the ugly facts and/or prevalent ignorance amongst the general public, represented here by run of the mill sheep putting forth their best ostrich impersonations.
That's not a difficult point to comprehend.
It's apparently too difficult for you to articulate your point until cowwhipped in that direction.
what is the point of this post
If it makes you sleep better at night, then believe as you wish.
Would you like some help with the hard words? I'm not sure what you are asking, exactly...
I sleep just fine with or without reading your crappy posts. There is, however, entertainment value in reading them.
You might be the first polarized bi-polar poster I've ever seen.
so you think paperless voting should be addressed.
k, you already mentioned that earlier.
Was there an ulterior motive for trying to lay out Obama birthers, the left, and the mill sheep here that are putting forth their best ostrich impersonations?
I've never heard such a story, and I've got my ear down in the depths of crazy white people conspiracies against Obama.
Rigging the electronic voting machines is nothing new. Bush did it, and he was running for President, so there's no telling what Congress has done and plans to do this election.
All so called evidence of that went nowhere, because there is no evidence. Just allegations. You talking about the Ohio incident?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions