Reply With Quote
Whoops, my bad Chumpdumper and Manny...I was just quickly skimming
CD wasn't saying you're Rambo. He was saying thats how Yonivore paints a CDL holder.
Whoops, my bad Chumpdumper and Manny...I was just quickly skimming
This is what I get for not ever reading anything Yoni has to say.
Although Chump is still a broooooaaaaaddddd brush kind of guy.
What did you get? I'm eager to learn about the reward.
lol no problem. I can see how that could have been misconstrued.Whoops, my bad Chumpdumper and Manny...I was just quickly skimming
I'm still kind of wondering how yoni is playing this particular situation out in his mind. Would the teacher have the gun in her purse? Under her skirt in a thigh holster? In her bra? She would have to be ready to shoot a kid at any given second, right? I doubt the student announced his intention to produce two guns and take hostages in advance.
I have mixed feelings about "gun free zones" but I can't say that introducing more guns would help every situation.
I'm voting for the gun bra.
Will the next guy only shoot himself? What about a past incident were several students were killed and injured.
I agree. Good gun control by someone following concealed carry rules is the key. The first amendment rocks. A well trained militia is needed for us to protect our communities as well.
That already happens outside the classroom. Both thugs and cops shoot people without good reason.
Is that an argument for having it happen inside the classrooms as well?
You're right. Much easier to arm teachers than to invest a little time and energy into making sure kids don't become troubled enough to want to blast the school.
Just how many teachers want to wear a firearm in class?
That's a different topic yet. Mostly because of the breakdown of family values.
wrong amendment
how will a militia prevent the next columbine?
Talk to the wolverines.
True, I meant the second.
Wow... you caught me on a mistake. That a point for you!
We can argue if or not a columbine shooting would have been stopped. I would say that factual cases in the past bear out that they would have been stopped before they could have hurt as many as they did.
They fact that teachers may be armed alone can be a deterrent to stop such things. Many who use firearms are pussies. When they realize they may come to someone equally armed, they will likely fold.
Ever play poker?
Great movie. I'll have to add that to my Blu-ray collection if they come out in that format.Talk to the wolverines.
You should always bring a gun to a poker game.
huh? past examples show that your ad hoc hypothetical solution of having militias would have mitigated the harm of past examples? how could anything of the sort ever be proved?
is this an argument based on fact? or are you just making up as you go along?
Where do the Cubans attack first?Talk to the wolverines.
Nebraska.
No argument here.
More guns to make it safer seems like a bad option to me. We don't need to concentrate fire in crowded classrooms, filled with precious children. I feel a little embarrassed I even have to point that out.
There was a little reported story some time back where a teacher went back to his car, got his pistol, and stopped a shooting. He had a conceal carry permit, but wasn't permitted to use it on campus. He saved the day.
The point is it works as a deterrent. Sure, some heads will still act, but the deterrent value is real. In no gun zones, the lawful follow the law. Criminals don't. That creates an unfair advantage for the criminals.
It works as a deterrent. I thought there was no effective deterrent against the insane and criminally depraved. Can't you make up your mind, WC?
It only deters those too timid to do it in the first place.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
