It's
not odd you insignificant zero, and you'd easily understand that if you took 2 seconds to actually read Hollinger's explanation on how the formula works.
Miami has a higher overall scoring margin, a higher recent (last 10 games) scoring margin, and an overall strength of schedule equal to that of the spurs, a slightly tougher recent strength of schedule (last 10 games),
and they've played 4 more games on the road than the spurs.
It makes sense to argue about inherently subjective rankings (Stein's, nba power rankings, cbs power rankings, etc.). It makes little sense to question the placement of teams on a ranking system that is
entirely automated because it's a formula that spits out a number. That's the fundamental difference here.
The fact that you're incapable of going to the site, reading his explanation, and then figuring out why Miami is ranked above the spurs is just laughable. It's ing obvious you idiot. Look at the rankings, read up as to how they are formulated (as well as the rationale for placing as much emphasis on certain variables as Hollinger does) and figure it out yourself.
http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/insid...Rankings-Intro