Reply With Quote
Did you notice I said you can get 10-1 about the Spurs in Oz? I think we're 6-1 in Vegas. Nice odds Downunder.
Anyway, I'm off to party like it's NYE 2010-11, because it is!
LOL I was just thinking the very same thing!
Did you notice I said you can get 10-1 about the Spurs in Oz? I think we're 6-1 in Vegas. Nice odds Downunder.
Anyway, I'm off to party like it's NYE 2010-11, because it is!
I rolled my eyes a fair amount after the game w/ Chuck being Chuck and sticking with his ridiculous soundbite. The least he could do is be more original - "Naw, man, I still like the Mavs, still think they're better. Spurs didn't prove anything by winning a game they should have won without Dirk."
But that's about as invested as I was in what he said, because his whole goal on that show is to provide outlandish takes and interesting fodder for arguments, not to present a cogent defense of his thoughtful basketball analysis.
Yes, Shoog, it being the Knicks has something to do with it, but it's a combination of revitalized/interesting Knicks and top of the league fast-paced Spurs.
You can't tell me anyone outside hardcore fans wanted to see that matchup two years ago.
wow barkley is talkin like a drunk......says
1) dallas will go further than spurs in the playoffs
2) 2 best teams in the east are the teams from florida.....
Bulls are the most dangerous team.
A team that starts Keith Bogans will NEVER win . Or even a team that plays Keith Bogans 10 minutes a game will NEVER win .
looks like kenny smith had some of barkleys stuff. doesnt think love is an all star
Oh, there's definitely more interest in the Spurs. But any Knick team that looks like it has a shot at the playoffs is going to get overhyped. If this years' Knicks were playing last years' Spurs, the % wouldn't be as high, but I bet it'd still win.
Charles seems drunk tonight. Like legit.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions