Troy Murphy Anyone?

[SenorSpur]

We're 45-9...why do people keep trying to change the team? This is the team we're rolling with to the playoffs, and I couldn't be happier. Quit trying to fix what ain't broke.

Because like it or not, the Spurs are STILL at a tremendous size disadvantage against the Fakers and Celtics. Two of the teams that they will eventually have to conquer if they want to be the last team standing.

Don't get me wrong. The record is great, but all other NBA teams do not even come close to presenting the type of size and physical advantage the Fakers and Celtics have. Because those teams have matched up against one another in the past 2 NBA Finals, they've both made conscious offseason moves to counter one another. The rest of the playoff contenders would be wise to react accordingly.

How the Spurs can matchup against those two teams is what really matters.

[Bito Corleone]

This thread again, eh?

[cutewizard]

I read somewhere (don't ask me where because I don't know) that if he gets bought out, that Orlando and the Spurs are the front runners for his services, and that he's leaning toward the Spurs.

cool

we could get really stacked in here

[CGD]

I think the Spurs are really high on this guy and certainly would jump at a chance to get him in event of a buy-out. Not to mention, a stint with the Spurs would likely rehabilitate his career.

[Hoops Czar]

cool

we could get really stacked in here

That's funny, I read Celtics and Mavs.

[portnoy1]

I honestly don't think Troy Murphy can play Matt Bonner's role as well as Matt Bonner. I'm not saying that Murphy's not the better player, but Bonner is doing a very good job at what he is supposed to do. Murphy's still in his prime and is capable of putting up 15 and 10 on piss poor teams, he's going to want around 30 minutes give or take anywhere he goes. And you know what else makes me think he wouldn't shoot .500 from three? Because Matt Bonner is the only one doing it. This better be the last time I have to say that we don't want Troy Murphy. He can rebound, but a three point shooter is no help on the offensive boards. I think defensively we do a good job rebounding. Duncan can rebound, Blair can rebound, Dice, Splitter's starting to break in, and Bonner's not nearly as bad as some of you people give him credit for. He'll get you around 5 rebounds in 25 minutes of play give or take, Troy Murphy may give you 7. Big deal. Plus Bonner's just as good a defender. Murphy is the better player, but Bonner is a smarter player and is more efficient for the Spurs in this situation. Not saying we would be worse with Murphy, I'm just saying he's not worth it.

One of these days you kids will learn that basketball is about more than just someone's NBA 2K rating.

How is Bonner Smarter as a player? Thats a stretch frankly. If you were to say Oberto, A guy who had no exact skill but helped the team tremendously during their runs, then I would understand saying that someone is smarter. But exactly what has Matt Bonner done that Makes him Smarter than Troy Murphy?

[ChumpDumper]

So why does Murphy suck this season?

[8FOR!3]

How is Bonner Smarter as a player? Thats a stretch frankly. If you were to say Oberto, A guy who had no exact skill but helped the team tremendously during their runs, then I would understand saying that someone is smarter. But exactly what has Matt Bonner done that Makes him Smarter than Troy Murphy?

You're right. I meant more intelligent in general.

[Gagnrath]

I don't want murphy, I want a fast 6'10" or better guy with enough strength to not get shoved around in the paint. Must be able to rebound and not be stupid with fouls. The only offense you need is to be able to put back rebounds and a lay in or dunk when force fed under the rim. Honestly Blair 2 inches taller and 10% faster would be perfect. I like Blair alot but he's slightly slower than I'd like and just a little to short. Fairly smart basketball wise with great heart but I would love to see his brain and heart in a slightly different body.

[Spursfan092120]

Because like it or not, the Spurs are STILL at a tremendous size disadvantage against the Fakers and Celtics. Two of the teams that they will eventually have to conquer if they want to be the last team standing.

Don't get me wrong. The record is great, but all other NBA teams do not even come close to presenting the type of size and physical advantage the Fakers and Celtics have. Because those teams have matched up against one another in the past 2 NBA Finals, they've both made conscious offseason moves to counter one another. The rest of the playoff contenders would be wise to react accordingly.

How the Spurs can matchup against those two teams is what really matters.

I see where you're coming from with this..but at the same time, they can't match our shooters. Back in the day, we used to make people play our style, now we always adjust to theirs. Granted, we were big when we made them play our style, but with our shooting, I truly think Blair, Tim, and McDyess can handle the size issues underneath and Bonner can spread it out a bit. I truly don't believe any team in the playoffs can match our backcourt with Tony, Manu, and George. The size will be the issue, but I think we can overcome that. I truly do.

[Big P]

So why does Murphy suck this season?

Looks like he has played about 18 games, started 4 and his last game was on Jan. 7.

[K-State Spur]

Because like it or not, the Spurs are STILL at a tremendous size disadvantage against the Fakers and Celtics. Two of the teams that they will eventually have to conquer if they want to be the last team standing....
How the Spurs can matchup against those two teams is what really matters.

And there is nobody the Spurs can add who negates that size advantage. That's a mismatch in the opponent's any way you cut it.

On the other hand, the Spurs offer a quicker, better shooting club than most of the opposition.

I know that San Antonio has kinda been the chameleons over the years. Always beating the opponents at their own game. But this team's best chance is to force the opponents to adjust to them.

I mentioned this in another thread, but LA isn't going to play Bynum in crunch time anyways. A Gasol/Odom front line is still long, but it's by no means unmanageable for Duncan/Dyess (as evidenced 2 weeks ago).

[Indazone]

Why would anyone want T-Murph. It's not like he's a scoring and rebounding machine.

[EricB]

Not within ten feet of this team. Keep away....

[E-RockWill]

If he signs on the cheap, sure. He would be playoff insurance @ best.

[xmas1997]

Like Glenn Robinson was once upon a time.

[SenorSpur]

I'd actually prefer Jason Thompson of the Sad Sac Kings.

[Mel_13]

Adrian Wojnarowski:

The Hornets will likely be in pursuit of New Jersey Nets forward Troy Murphy(notes) once the Nets reach a buyout agreement with him after the trade deadline. Nets coach Avery Johnson made clear he didn’t want Murphy after the three-team trade that brought him from the Indiana Pacers. Trade talks have gone nowhere for Murphy, who has an expiring contract. Nets GM Billy King will ultimately work a buyout to free Murphy to sign elsewhere.

In addition to the Hornets, several other teams are expected to show interest in Murphy, including the Boston Celtics, Miami Heat, Orlando Magic and Dallas Mavericks, sources said.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slu...ynuggets021511

[bus driver]

i like him, he is in funny on the dave chappelle show

[tuncaboylu]

We don't need him.

We can go after a back-up SF when buyouts complete, but Troy is totally useless.

[duncan228]

Would Troy Murphy be a good fit with the Spurs?
Tim Griffin

There’s been a lot of message-board speculation that disgruntled New Jersey forward Troy Murphy could help the Spurs this season in a playoff push.

Murphy has fallen out Coach Avery Johnson’s favor and the Nets’ rotation because of his frequent defensive lapses, but could help a contending team because of his perimeter shooting skills and his rebounding.

Nets general manager Billy King told the YES Network earlier this week that he is actively working to move Murphy before the Feb. 24 trade deadline (hat tip Pro Basketball Talk.com.)

“Obviously, you know, I’m very focused on Troy,” King told the network. “I feel bad for Troy in this situation, but I think something will come before the deadline.”

Keep reading...

http://blog.mysanantonio.com/spursna...ith-the-spurs/

[jjktkk]

Murphy would be the 4th bigman at best if the Spurs got him. Highly doubt Murphy would be happy in that scenario.

[duncan228]

Hit the link for detail.

Clarifying Troy Murphy talk: Trade no, buyout maybe
Jeff McDonald

...Since the Spurs are over the salary cap, league rules prohibit them from adding salary via trade. As such, if the Spurs were to trade for Murphy, they would have to send out as much payroll as they take in.


...If the Spurs do have interest in Murphy, it is likely to come after the Feb. 24 trade deadline.

http://blog.mysanantonio.com/spursna...-buyout-maybe/

[portnoy1]

If Bonner can get 22minutes a game by hitting 3's and playing passable defense then.......How can Murphy not get playing time with his abilities. Murphy is 6-11, and although he cant shoot 3's at 50% he can shoot it at 40% and do more off the dribble and on the perimeter when teams close out on him. He can also grab offensive rebounds despite what people say. 2008-09 11.8rbs 2.0off / 2005-06 10rbs 2.6off / 2004-05 10.8rbs 3.6off / 2002-03 10.2rbs 2.9off. And his 3pt shooting is more than good. 2007-08 40% / 2008-09 45% / 2009-10 38%. He is a 30minute a game player, so if you give him matt bonners minutes you can probably expect 8pts 5-6rbs and not get beasted on the boards like someone else the spurs have.

[jjktkk]

If Bonner can get 22minutes a game by hitting 3's and playing passable defense then.......How can Murphy not get playing time with his abilities. Murphy is 6-11, and although he cant shoot 3's at 50% he can shoot it at 40% and do more off the dribble and on the perimeter when teams close out on him. He can also grab offensive rebounds despite what people say. 2008-09 11.8rbs 2.0off / 2005-06 10rbs 2.6off / 2004-05 10.8rbs 3.6off / 2002-03 10.2rbs 2.9off. And his 3pt shooting is more than good. 2007-08 40% / 2008-09 45% / 2009-10 38%. He is a 30minute a game player, so if you give him matt bonners minutes you can probably expect 8pts 5-6rbs and not get beasted on the boards like someone else the spurs have.

Murphy is not a 30 minute player anymore. Plus, if your the Spurs, why would you want to potentially mess up the chemistry of the team by bringing in a guy like Murphy, who would want more minutes than the Spurs Pop is willing to dish out?