Why is secession a bad idea?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

"peace treaty with american defense of texas"

... USA should move all US military bases (and civilian support) out of TX, and send TX an annual bill for assuring TX defense, including MX border defense.

And move NASA out, too, if the Repugs don't kill NASA completely.

This just goes to show how ing idiotic your takes are.

I do not like most of the GOP policies over the last 40 years but one thing they have done is support big science.

You look at big projects like the particle collider that was to be built in Waxahachie and if you knew a damn thing beyond what you read in the Huffington Post, you would know that it was Reagan that was behind it. It was Clinton who killed. Obama likes to talk about infrastructure but it was Ike who built it.

Most of all large scale engineering projects of the last 60 years have been organized by the GOP. Democrats like to point to NASA and crow about Kennedy but it was during the Nixon administration that it grew to the size that it eventually did.

The problem is that most of the projects that NASA has been working on are and their maintenance of existing projects has been . they needed to be scuttled. if they want more funding then they need to propose something that is not .

They have not done that for all the talk of maglev and scramjets. They have been working on that for 40 years now with no tangible results.

You mindlessly like to write blank checks no matter what. Perhaps you should know something about it before you go spouting off.

NASA has been mismanaged since Apollo was canceled. they need a wakeup call. Not a blank check.

[boutons_deux]

Repug budget cuts

http://climateprogress.org/2011/02/1...te+Progress%29

http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/...pagemode=print

http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...ies-targeted-f

but Barry:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-02-...ce-health.html

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Repug budget cuts

http://climateprogress.org/2011/02/1...te+Progress%29

http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/...pagemode=print

http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...ies-targeted-f

but Barry:

http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-02-...ce-health.html

lol at you taking political posturing at face value. the proof is in the pudding and this is not even ty mix.

none of this goes against the trends of the last 50+ years or your blathering on NASA. you do not even evaluate based on merits, you just mindlessly go dems: good, GOP: bad.

You are a minion just like so many others.