Yes.
If the Spurs have home court advantage, yes.
If not, play to win.
It's too soon to tank a game while teams like Boston are still relatively close to Spurs.
Saying that, Mavs keeping the 2nd seed is a better scenario for Spurs than Lakers having the 2nd seed. If Spurs lose against Dallas, helping Mavs to keep that spot will be a silver lining of the loss.
Don't tank, but like Bruno said a loss has its upside too.
Win/win for the Spurs really.
that is the stupidest idea i ever heard. and why exactly would spurs rather face dallas in wcf than lakers?
I haven't read through these replies yet but NO !!! Never tank games to Dallas. Unfortunately, we won't be able to send them away packing in the playoffs because they aren't getting by the Lakers (HCA or not) but we can at least beat them in a regular season game.
No telling what Pop might do though.
Yeah, the OP sounds like a Phil Jackson protege.
OP, winning teams don't tank for any reason.
Yeah, it's time we started laying down statement games with regularity.
Spuds should tank, not like their winning anyway. Gives you guys a good excuse lolololololol
Ur still little fat and ugly..... YOU LOST.....
Oh yeah your team has no les either, thats to add to the ing ether there, never won shyt.
Please don't feed the Spurs fan posing as a troll.
Awwww, but it's an ST tradition!
![]()
I didn't know you posted here! I'm a big fan of Purple Rain. Batdance was pretty whack, tho.
yup I was half serious when I meant tank.
I actually meant not take it as a must win, cause it's also good that mavs win.
We don't know who we gonna face. But IMO Lakers away would make for a longer Dallas vs. Lakers series and a longer series would tire both teams. That is why...
If you're really entertaining the idea that the Spurs should tank against the Mavs (in order to help them secure the 2-seed), then your fear of the Lakers is duly noted.
you can call it fear if you want.
I call it preffering to run vs. a tired horse.
Mavs don't need any help against the Spurs if they are healthy.
Unfortunately, both Mavs and Spurs need help against a healthy Laker team.
The Spurs are going at least 6 with OKC so how much rest do you think they'll get?
Besides, the Lakers are 11-2 (something along those lines) on B2B's and are playing great basketball in the 2nd half of the season--when tired legs usually start to show.
The Lakers can beat the Mavs 4-3 or 4-0, won't change the fact that SA doesn't have the horses to handle LA in the paint for a lengthy series.
thanks for both your inputs mavfans![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)