Share your trade
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...radeId=3hpx9nd
Portland get the back up/spot starter they need.
OC gets a very good big man as well and cap relief (can shed $5 MM of their budget).
We get two potential starters.
I never said it was ideal, just that as it stands, he's probably the easiest player to acquire who has talent. No one can deny he's talented, but talent alone does not a good basketball player make. Hence my reservation about actually trying to trade for him.
Share your trade
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...radeId=3hpx9nd
Portland get the back up/spot starter they need.
OC gets a very good big man as well and cap relief (can shed $5 MM of their budget).
We get two potential starters.
the only delusional part of the trade was Blair for Ibaka. OKC would never trade Ibaka for Blair, even dumping Nate.
I think Portland would consider Hill for Batum, especially after they got Wallace.
If so, I couldn't do that deal fast enough.
If I was the blazers I would definatly look in to acquiring parker if he was avaliable..TP-Mathews-Wallace-LA-camby looks pretty damn good.
What about this adjusted trade:
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...radeId=3oyas8g
So you're giving up 3 young players for 2? Pass...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)