Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 53
  1. #26
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    Dirk has never reacted well to legit small ball. Mainly because he has a hard time guarding the perimeter. It also means Dallas has one less 7 footer under the basket. Legit small ball are teams that gain an athletic and shooting advantage forcing a team relying on bigs for interior defense away from the basket. Dallas is the perfect team if you got the right lineup to go small ball against. OKC is very athletic and even more athletic when Perkins is out of the game. They seem to be the perfect storm if they chose going small with Durant and Ibaka (or Collison) as their bigs.


    and on the other end, with them going small, it means they have no inside presence. dirk (if they actually would give him a ing call) will score or be fouled at will. barea will shred the interior. and chandler should have no problems catching oops off screens. not to mention how easily chandler has been dominating the boards already.

    works both ways, stupid . playing small ball only hurts dirk on the defensive end somewhat, and thats about it, because the mavs still have big guys who can match up with smaller guys just fine, like Marion and Chandler. it would hurt the Thunder a whole lot more on their defensive end though.

  2. #27
    5 Bill_Brasky's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    11,220
    OP is an idiot, a got, and an 8 seed in the game of life, a bid he probably shouldn't have gotten in the first place.

  3. #28
    Ur a fkn wanker Venti Quattro's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    29,402
    mavsfan1000 you are a ing idiot. that's it and that's all

  4. #29
    O & 44!!! Now, go back &
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    35,170
    Thou is overwraught. He's starting to get close to "it." The pressure is starting to ratchet up and he can't sit still, or, maintain a cogent thought in his fevered gourd.

    Frankly, it's adorable. If he were a girl I'd spank his ass till it was like two Jap flags.

  5. #30
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    14,096


    and on the other end, with them going small, it means they have no inside presence. dirk (if they actually would give him a ing call) will score or be fouled at will. barea will shred the interior. and chandler should have no problems catching oops off screens. not to mention how easily chandler has been dominating the boards already.

    works both ways, stupid . playing small ball only hurts dirk on the defensive end somewhat, and thats about it, because the mavs still have big guys who can match up with smaller guys just fine, like Marion and Chandler. it would hurt the Thunder a whole lot more on their defensive end though.
    Having Ibaka under the basket is a good thing for OKC. Having him guard Dirk takes away his ability to shotblock as he has to stay close to Dirk and not wonder around. Dirk can't guard Durant so he would have to guard most likely a guard. That is a big mismatch imo. Just like when Dirk had to guard Stephen Jackson. That was more than just a slightly tough matchup for Dirk. Chandler is maybe the closest we get to the answer for small ball at the center position though. Thank goodness for him. Miami is also another candidate for a team that is capable of being tougher for Dallas by going small ball. Put Bosh at Center and Lebron at Power Forward forcing Dirk to guard James Jones. A legit 3 point shooter.

  6. #31
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    14,096
    mavsfan1000 you are a ing idiot. that's it and that's all
    Gotta love it when fans of other teams think they know so much about the Mavs. Small ball has worked twice before against the Mavs in the playoffs and almost turned one series around when the Spurs went small ball against us in 06. Spurs weren't quite as good with small ball though as it didn't really help them gain an athletic advantage. It helped spacing some though which really helped Duncan.

  7. #32
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    14,096
    I think Dallas is a very unusual matchup. Mainly because of Dirk. He changes a way teams can guard Dallas. Their bigs are forced to come out against Dirk at 4 position. Thus, your bigs are almost useless on interior defensive when having to guard Dirk. Thus you need to have a more mobile guy to guard Dirk and be able to recover. And I will have to say it. Dirk is a great post defender against most 4's. Pau Gasol being a prime example of that. He uses his length to really bother players. Odom was a tougher matchup for him because he is more like a 3 and can do more damage off the dribble. I also think Dirk is a pretty good help defender. Thus you take away 2 of his strengths. Defense when going small forces him farther from the basket and not having him guard a post player (or a player that plays close to the basket) like Ibaka.

  8. #33
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    Having Ibaka under the basket is a good thing for OKC. Having him guard Dirk takes away his ability to shotblock as he has to stay close to Dirk and not wonder around. Dirk can't guard Durant so he would have to guard most likely a guard. That is a big mismatch imo. Just like when Dirk had to guard Stephen Jackson. That was more than just a slightly tough matchup for Dirk. Chandler is maybe the closest we get to the answer for small ball at the center position though. Thank goodness for him. Miami is also another candidate for a team that is capable of being tougher for Dallas by going small ball. Put Bosh at Center and Lebron at Power Forward forcing Dirk to guard James Jones. A legit 3 point shooter.
    you ing idiot

    there is a different between a paint defender, and a weakside shotblocker.

    ibaka is a guy who gets most of his blocks either preying on ty offensive players, or coming over from the wing to double down and block the shot. but he is not like Dwight Howard, Bynum, or Chandler in being able to man the paint, and still consistently blocking/contesting shots that come in his area.

    and im not too concerned if Dirk is forced to guard someone like Sefalosha or Ibaka if the Thunder were to go small.

    you still dont realize just how ing horrible the rebounding would be if they had Ibaka at center and Durant at PF. or in Miami's case, how bad it would be if Bosh was C, and Bron was PF. it would be a ing disaster.

    you also dont realize how some players simply arent as comfortable on offense when put in other positions they arent familiar with. we learned this last year when putting Butler at SG as opposed to SF.

    god damn you are a stupid bag of , because you still have no other reason to believe that going small would help the Thunder in ways other than making Dirk work a bit more on defense.

  9. #34
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    Having Ibaka under the basket is a good thing for OKC. Having him guard Dirk takes away his ability to shotblock as he has to stay close to Dirk and not wonder around.
    and after re-reading, i just realized how much of an idiot you are by this statement.

    the only thing ibaka does good on defense is block shots, so by taking away his shotblocking, that is supposed to HELP the Thunder?????????

    stupid ing moron

    dpg should ban your ass just for the fact that you are so adamant about the stupid ignorant you spout

  10. #35
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    24,173

    dpg should ban your ass

  11. #36
    5 Bill_Brasky's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    11,220
    I think Dallas is a very unusual matchup. Mainly because of Dirk. He changes a way teams can guard Dallas. Their bigs are forced to come out against Dirk at 4 position. Thus, your bigs are almost useless on interior defensive when having to guard Dirk. Thus you need to have a more mobile guy to guard Dirk and be able to recover. And I will have to say it. Dirk is a great post defender against most 4's. Pau Gasol being a prime example of that. He uses his length to really bother players. Odom was a tougher matchup for him because he is more like a 3 and can do more damage off the dribble. I also think Dirk is a pretty good help defender. Thus you take away 2 of his strengths. Defense when going small forces him farther from the basket and not having him guard a post player (or a player that plays close to the basket) like Ibaka.
    Jesus ing christ dude, this is a worse idea than a Matt Millen draft pick.

  12. #37
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    14,096
    and after re-reading, i just realized how much of an idiot you are by this statement.

    the only thing ibaka does good on defense is block shots, so by taking away his shotblocking, that is supposed to HELP the Thunder?????????

    stupid ing moron

    dpg should ban your ass just for the fact that you are so adamant about the stupid ignorant you spout
    Yep re-read what I said. Look who the ing moron is now. Having him under the basket allows for him to shotblock. You do that by putting him at Center. Not power forward where he has to guard Dirk. ing moron can't understand but loves to talk .
    Last edited by mavsfan1000; 05-22-2011 at 01:25 PM.

  13. #38
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    14,096
    Since some didn't get how exactly small ball would work.
    Ibaka guards Chandler
    Sefolosha guards Dirk
    Durant guards Marion
    Harden guards Stevenson
    Westbrook guards Kidd

    On the other end, Dirk will have to guard Durant or Sefolosha. Not a good matchup for Dirk. He'd rather guard Ibaka but Chandler needs to be around the rim for needed interior defense. So Chandler would need to guard Ibaka to do that. Taking away one of Dallas's twin towers from around the rim will hurt Dallas's interior defense. It will allow more space for Westbrook to get to the basket and open up for some more open 3's. This also forces Kidd to play someone with more scoring ability to start the game. Could wear Kidd out. If Scott Brooks actually does it and OKC wins, than I deserve some credit for the idea. And not being a ing moron like some think around here.

  14. #39
    Banned
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    4,113
    It's not about getting laid as much as it's about those two being the only people who thinking abstinence is practical
    Getting laid....something you don't know about got
    So your opinion on anything pussy related is rather useless

  15. #40
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    Yep re-read what I said. Look who the ing moron is now. Having him under the basket allows for him to shotblock. You do that by putting him at Center. Not power forward where he has to guard Dirk. ing moron can't understand but loves to talk .
    then who the guards dirk? durant?

  16. #41
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    Sefolosha guards Dirk
    no need to read the rest of this post. this statement alone ranks among the all time dumb statements of human history. you would be better off trying to a bowl of stale corn flakes, than ever trying to talk basketball again.

  17. #42
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    not to mention, Dirk guarding Sefalosha is a matchup i would be perfectly happy with, if it means the Thunder go small, and decide to sacrifice defense, shotblocking, rebounding, and every other possible matchup on the court, aside from who Dirk has to guard. its not like Sefalosha is some scoring machine. dude hits spot up threes, and hits a hustle layup from time to time, and thats it. he is basically the Deshawn Stevenson of the Thunder. Pretty much all Dirk has to do is not give up the 3 to him, and hes golden. Sefalosha isnt good enough to make the Mavs pay consistently by beating Dirk off the dribble. He may make a play once in a while, but more often than not, he will either take a bad shot, make a bad pass, or accomplish absolutely nothing at all.

  18. #43
    Veteran endrity's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    3,050
    you also dont realize how some players simply arent as comfortable on offense when put in other positions they arent familiar with. we learned this last year when putting Butler at SG as opposed to SF.
    Truer words have not be spoken. That was the one big big mistake Carlisle made, which we all thought was the right move as well. But moving Caron back to the 3 was one of the key decisions that jumpstarted this amazing season.

  19. #44
    Veteran endrity's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    3,050
    However Findog, Mavsfan1000 is partly correct here. Small Ball has been the best thing for the Thunder in this series. True, Chandler owned the paint last night when they did it, but it was better than playing with two bigs. They don't get enough spacing/scoring with the bigs they have. And even with the smaller players, they are able to crowd Dirk a lot more.

    The Mavs have to counter by getting to the paing a lot more and with Chandler continuing to dominate the paint. However, I would not be surprised to see the Thunder go to small ball a lot more from now on. Chandler is killing Perkins right now, he can't keep up.

  20. #45
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    14,096
    Truer words have not be spoken. That was the one big big mistake Carlisle made, which we all thought was the right move as well. But moving Caron back to the 3 was one of the key decisions that jumpstarted this amazing season.
    It's easier to adapt with small ball than large ball. With small ball, you don't lose ball handling skills. Butler at shooting guard was way too slow. Maybe his fitness wasn't that good last year as well. He lost some weight in the offseason.

  21. #46
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    14,096
    Anyways, I thinking Collison instead of Sefolosha would definitely be the better choice to guard Dirk. I'm still thinking of the way the Warriors 07 and Rockets 05 guarded Dirk. I think smaller players have better chance to bother Dirk. No one is going to block Dirk's shot anyways due to his high release. I think smaller players annoy Dirk with their quickness. I've even seen Tony Parker bother Dirk. The main thing is Perkins is totally worthless. And lmao at thinking taking out Perkins will destroy the Thunders inside game.

  22. #47
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    lol i saw plenty of small ball last night, and it still didnt work

    great in idea, bullfan1000

    got

  23. #48
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    14,096
    lol i saw plenty of small ball last night, and it still didnt work

    great in idea, bullfan1000

    got
    It got them a 15 point lead with 5 minutes left. Can't blame smallball for Durant falling apart. Ibaka got plenty of blocks when guarding Chandler.

  24. #49
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    17,070
    It got them a 15 point lead with 5 minutes left. Can't blame smallball for Durant falling apart. Ibaka got plenty of blocks when guarding Chandler.
    and in the end, it still didnt work once the Mavs got their heads out of their asses and actually started rebounding the damn ball. the fact that OKC played small most of the game and still massively outrebounded the Mavs is more of an anomaly than smallball working. majority of the time, they dont kick the mavs asses on rebounding like that when going small.

  25. #50
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    14,096
    and in the end, it still didnt work once the Mavs got their heads out of their asses and actually started rebounding the damn ball. the fact that OKC played small most of the game and still massively outrebounded the Mavs is more of an anomaly than smallball working. majority of the time, they dont kick the mavs asses on rebounding like that when going small.
    Nonetheless, the matchups suited the Mavs less. Dirk would rather have Ibaka guarding him and taking away their block shots than Collison guarding him with Ibaka under the basket. Actually it effects Dirk the least. The rest of the team is effected more by Ibaka being under the basket.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •