Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 35 of 35
  1. #26
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    He's got you there, TB. boutons's single point attack on your diction was successful.

    Shame!
    Not really. Boutons-bot's ESL skills are not up to snuff. Singular is easily parsed to reveal discreet. But, he wont find that on thinkprogress.borg.

  2. #27
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    Lebesgue's decomposition theorem.

  3. #28
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    "That singular poll was the basis for the OP"

    trashing talking singularity? you pretentiously misuse singular. What's your problem with single?

    And the article was about that one poll. Should they have waited until they had many polls?

    polling of who tea baggers are brings up the same demographics. white, ignorant, uneducated.
    Back that up, bot.

  4. #29
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    Singular is easily parsed to reveal discreet.
    You are correct. Very subtle, senyor. I think you mean discrete, tho.

  5. #30
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    That singular poll was the basis for the OP. Do the math.
    Well I can't argue that but I don't see the point of limiting the conversation to just the OP.

  6. #31
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    "Parsed to reveal" is unwieldy, but this is a mere quibble.

  7. #32
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    How would one go about proving causation in such a case though? I think correlation is the best that can be found.

  8. #33
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    You are correct. Very subtle, senyor. I think you mean discrete, tho.
    Whaddaya want for nothin'? A rubber biscuit? /Elwood Blues.

  9. #34
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    How would one go about proving causation in such a case though? I think correlation is the best that can be found.
    ok...draw those conclusions based on correlation. Good luck with all that.

  10. #35
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    ok...draw those conclusions based on correlation. Good luck with all that.
    What I meant was, would it even be possible to show causation? "Look, we gave 100 atheists brain damage, and 70 of those atheists then starting believing in a monotheistic God!"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •