Reply With Quote
Now I can consider that maybe... and that's a very shaky maybe... LBJ conspired, but not others you wish to blame.
Come on now. The recording is inconsistent, has muffled parts, appears cut and spliced.
You still ain't got Mouse.
Agree CC on Lyndon Johnson.
Here is E Howard Hunt's deathbed confession Wild Cobra.
CIA Howard Hunt that is of the Watergate scandal and big player in the Bay of Pigs invasion. He names Lyndon Johnson as well and admits the conspiracy, it was code named "The Big Event".
Now I can consider that maybe... and that's a very shaky maybe... LBJ conspired, but not others you wish to blame.
Come on now. The recording is inconsistent, has muffled parts, appears cut and spliced.
You still ain't got Mouse.
Already a few times you were very certain about things, then conceded certain points. Come on and have an open mind. CIA E Howard Hunt confessed. Regardless of whether or not you believe Bush had anything to do with it (which he DID), it's a no brainer that it was NOT the work of just a crazed lone gunman.
Did he confess?
Again, the tape sound's pretty inconsistent. Can you say with certainty it wasn't edited?
As for the "magic bullet" and other conspiracy ideas, I'm actually open to the idea that Oswald didn't act alone. I just don't believe it was a government conspiracy.
Still, there was a book published I think two or three years ago that made a perfectly sensible explanation how the events could have gone down with Oswald alone.
George Parr was the secret local organizer/money man and they had him killed when he was about to spill the beans after his conviction on tax evasion.
E Howard Hunts own son backs up the tapes and confession as well as identifies his father E. Howard Hunt as one of the bogus hobos that was arrested that day. There is no way around that one. He confessed the conspiracy plain and simple.
And no theory or book can explain how Oswald would be able to get that front head shot from behind in the book depository. In fact the first couple of shots were just about right on top of eachother, he couldn't have done that, especially with the rifle mentioned. The magic bullet, experts agree would not have been like-new after hitting bones and flesh, especially after 7 wounds. They also said they felt the end point of the back wound, making it impossible for that magic bullet to take place (thru the back, out the front of the throat, etc).
Even the doctors that originally worked on Kennedy all agreed that it was a frontal head shot and that autopsy photos later released were very inaccurate and different from what they witnessed. I'll take the doctors word on that.
Not to mention the rifle they said was used wasn't even the same rifle they claimed Oswald received in the mail, so they later changed the name of the rifle type to fit the governments story.
so what person did the actualy shooting?
Lucien Sarti, a known french mafia hitman was one of many named as gunmen by CIA agent E Howard Hunt.
I was framed I tell ya!!!!
why should we believe Hunt?
All I have to say is a successful spy novelist should be able to, you know, write a confession over the course of 40 years.
That's why it's a deathbed confession. Being close to your own death makes you want to admit certain things I've been told.
Too bad he died three years later.
ChumpDumper is so bland and goes with the status quo, if it ain't on Fox or CNN he ain't havin it
Not even trying to pick an argument with you brah, it just seems so fitting that you would believe Oswald was the sole perpetrator.
Haven't seen any credible theory to the contrary.ChumpDumper is so bland and goes with the status quo, if it ain't on Fox or CNN he ain't havin it
Not even trying to pick an argument with you brah, it just seems so fitting that you would believe Oswald was the sole perpetrator.
What is your theory?
lol bland
What are you? y?
Or, you want to place a nail in someone else's coffin.
I see that you know this man to have 100% integrity.
Longest. Deathbed confession. Ever.
y like your bf's burrito
my theory is that the CIA did it.
for those of you who live in dallas but there use to be a black guy that would hang out in that area and tell stories of how this was a conspiracy and how he saw the whole thing back then and he was taken to police station to give statements and what not. very interesting story, although not sure if he is still around. the last time i saw him they was quite a crowd around him.
i think it was alone attempt, for a loser to become recognized
Personally, I don't see how anyone can refute the video evidence of the head blast... the kill shot came from the front and could not have come from behind... a fact which implies that there was more than one shooter.
Nothing anyone here says can convince me that Kennedy's inertial response to the bullet impact was from a rear shot. Absolutely nothing, especially when one considers that the driver seemed to be braking prior to that shot (he accelerated afterwards)...
The fact that the Warren Commission tried so hard to negate the obvious is proof enough for me that there was a conspiracy... as for the who, and the why (motives) that's not nearly as important as admitting that yes, the plot to kill the president involved more than just one gunman...
the HSCA also confirmed that Oswald's bullets did all the killing.
good enough for me, tbh.
Oswald's shots through JFK's back and through his throat could have been fatal enough... BUT...
The reality of another shot fired at JFK from the front, invalidates the official story altogether... one that asserts as its primary argument, that Oswald acted alone... one that places Oswald in the book depository behind JFK.
Blatant denial of the obvious frontal attack on JFK (the physics is as clear as night and day in all the videos) is enough to warrant the placing of a ''conspiracy'' label on JFK's assassination, all in spite of the ''investigation's'' findings, tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
