the cost of doing business is newsworthy in this case, even if it doesn't hurt or deter J&J.
also, it's a marker for the public at large of serious wrongdoing and unethical business practices.
Brill calculates J&J may in the end have to pay a total of $6 billion in settlements for its misconduct. But he estimates the company made $18 billion in profits on Risperdal, just within the United States (on $20 billion in domestic sales, and there was $10 billion more in sales abroad).
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/opinion/nicholas-kristof-when-crime-pays-jjs-drug-risperdal.html?_r=0
For BigCorp, Big Crime Pays Big. (eg, BigFinance now bigger, wealthier, more powerful, more influential after causing the criminal Banksters' Great Depression)
the cost of doing business is newsworthy in this case, even if it doesn't hurt or deter J&J.
also, it's a marker for the public at large of serious wrongdoing and unethical business practices.
public opinion and legal process aren''t powerless. they can and have ruined companies. not saying this will happen here, but one never knows.
no effective hurt, no deterrence, Corporate-Americans are teflon coated
the public at large doesn't care because the public has no way to hurt or deter BigCorporate-American criminals. They can be outraged, maybe just shrug, but they know nothing will change. And hope they aren't in the next crop of BigCorp victims.
BigCorp s America, and American can't un themselves.
J&J rolled Texas and jacked up Medicaid payments:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/17/op...risperdal.htmlThe story begins when J&J’s previous antipsychotic medicine ended its patent life, so sales plunged as generics gained market share. In 1994, J&J released Risperdal as a successor, but the Food and Drug Administration said it wasn’t necessarily better than the previous version and in any case was effective primarily for schizophrenia in adults. That’s a small market, and J&J was more ambitious. It wanted a blockbuster with annual revenues of at least $1 billion.
So J&J reinvented Risperdal as a drug for a broad range of problems, targeting everyone from seniors with dementia to children with autism.
The company also turned to corporate welfare: It paid doctors and others consulting fees and successfully lobbied for Texas to adopt Risperdal in place of generics. This meant that the state paid $3,000 a year for each Medicaid patient taking it, rather than $250 a year for each, Brill says.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)