Reply With Quote
Pros ution should have been legalized long before sodomy was.
Does it?
How big is that margin?
Show us how big it is or shut the up.
Probably not much, since there was nothing to those stories, as Fox's "coverage" proved.Could you imagine if news outlets like CNN took on stories connecting Obama to Ayres, Wright, and others the same way Fox, Limbaugh, etc. did, rather than being obamapologists?
Pros ution should have been legalized long before sodomy was.
You are so ashamed of your stated political position that you want it to be hidden from the media when a presidential candidate espouses it.
You aren't making any sense.
I don't agree with pros ution, however, it isn't in my nature to agree to victimless criminal laws either.
You threw a fit about a story highlighting Paul's support of the legalization of pros ution.
So did Che, but he never knows what he's doing.
link to Paul endorsing the legalization of pros ution?
before you embarrass yourself further, let me remind you Paul believes the States have the right to decide on these laws. Not the Federal Goverment.
Great, then you can see why pros utes and pimps support him.
Why are you butthurt about this?
Again, how many CNN viewers considering Ron Paul will be turned off by this story?
They didn't even interview anyone against pros ution; it was kind of an infomercial for the Bunny Ranch tbh.
how, talk about being clueless
there is a large number of evangelicals that are considering voting for Ron Paul. They would be turned off by this story had they happen to see it. And before you claim they don't watch CNN. CNN is shown in various public places like airports, restaurants, etc.
lol That's CNN's target demographic. Evangelicals at airport gates and restaurants where the sound is turned off.
Paranoid delusion.
Sorry, che. People like you are more likely to turn off potential Paul supporters than any pros ute.
what??
now it all makes sense, you never been to an airport
now it all makes sense, you never been to an airport
Now it all makes sense, you've never been to a public place where the tv sound is turned down
You're the one who said CNN's strategy is to turn evangelical restaurant goers off of Ron Paul.
thanks for agreeing.
Agreeing with what?thanks for agreeing.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/1...n_1171462.html
Ron Paul CNN Interview: Did CNN Edit The Video Unfairly? (VIDEO)
An uncut version of Ron Paul's seemingly testy interview with CNN surfaced on Sunday, and has raised questions about whether or not the network may have unfairly edited the interview.
Paul was interviewed by CNN's Gloria Borger last week. During the version that aired on CNN, Borger asked Paul about controversial newsletters from the 1980s and 90s that were published under his name. Paul seemed to grow frustrated by Borger's questions. The candidate took off his mic while Borger was still speaking and abruptly ended the interview.
The unedited version that surfaced on Sunday seemingly caused some viewers to draw a different conclusion about how the interview ended.
The unedited version shows that the interview seemed to have lasted more than eight minutes. As The Hill pointed out, Borger interviewed Paul about a number of topics. While Paul was clearly frustrated, he answered questions about the newsletters for "almost three minutes before walking off, and that the interview was likely over." Paul supporters have been criticizing the network for what they believe was an unfair editing job by CNN.
Edited Version:
UnEdited Version:
It was wise to change the particular subject to something we've discussed prior, but even now you fail at reading comprehension.even the Huffington Post is with El Che on this one
lol Paul "occasionally read" his own newsletter.
And yeah, he cut the interview off as advertised. The only thing they cut out from the newsletter portion of the interview was the stupid "Would you give it back?" question.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
