Reply With Quote
I'd wager the vast majority of 10 year olds have no clue what getting a tattoo means and in this particular case, I think society has an obligation to save the kid from his ignorant mother.
Ah, so like cir sion. Got ya
I'd wager the vast majority of 10 year olds have no clue what getting a tattoo means and in this particular case, I think society has an obligation to save the kid from his ignorant mother.
pretty much.Well I suppose.....save her some possible fear later OR possibly force her to deal with something she doesn't want later. Seems like the typical decisions we parents are faced with constantly, huh?
. Don't open that can of worms.
10 year olds will grow quite a bit, ing their pretty tattoo all up. Mom should know better.
and there it is
Excellent!
Who had #31 in the betting pool? Honestly when I didn't see c*** ***s on the first page I thought we might go the whole thread without it.
Why not just tell the kid "look, when you reach puberty and can make your own decisions, your brother will likely still be just as dead, so wait till then, now go draw him a nice crayon picture"
As to the original question, no, I wouldn't approve it.
As someone else said, assuming their laws there are like the laws in Texas, the artist should have told the mother it was illegal for him to give the kid a tat even if she approved.
THAT being said, I don't think it's the states business whether the kid gets a tat or not.
No I would not.
good god it took that long to get a koriwhat joke in? The man must be losing his charm...
No
i actually got another tattoo about 3 hrs ago & another about 2 weeks ago.
btw, you all! good day es.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
