Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 30 of 30
  1. #26
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Perhaps these people shouldn't gamble something as important as their retirement money on the stock market. But if they still are willing to do it, what's the problem?
    RetirED people shouldn't really be in the stock market.

    People who want to retire someday should be.

    Risk=return over the long run.

    Sound saving for retirement says your first money should go into stocks when you are young, then an increasing proportion of your savings should flow into progressively less risky investments over time as you draw nearer to the point where you will draw down on it.

  2. #27
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    The Group of 20 has spouted the importance of “inclusive growth” for years without spelling out what it really means or how to generate it. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, at least, will be telling G-20 finance ministers in Chengdu, China, this weekend what it thinks it should mean for taxation: less of it on low-income workers and more on high-income shareholders.


    The Paris-based think tank has just junked the conventional economic wisdom on taxit had been promoting for years. That old view said income from capital that individuals receive–such as interest, rents, and dividends–should be taxed much more lightly than wages and salaries.


    “For the past 30 years we’ve been saying don’t try to tax capital more because you’ll lose it, you’ll lose investment. Well this argument is dead, so it’s worth revisiting the whole story,” Pascal Saint-Amans, the OECD’s tax chief, said in an interview.
    http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/...tax-guidebook/

  3. #28
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,976
    Instigated by the OECD itself, starting next year tax authorities in more than 50 countries, including all G-20 nations along with Panama and Switzerland, will start automatically exchanging citizens’ tax and bank account details. Up to 100 nations promise to take part after that.

  4. #29
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    be worse under CLINTON!

  5. #30
    Displaced 101A's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    7,711
    The rate should be raise, but why not just report it as regular income? Why is the government so obsessed with HOW people make their money? It just makes everything more complicated than necessary, and distorts the market. Income should be income.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •