Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 39 of 39
  1. #26
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    So are you saying that Obama officials have not and will not go to Priority USA fundraisers because it is illegal?
    link what you have or just shut up.

  2. #27
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406

  3. #28
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    link what you have or just shut up.
    lol. You said it was against the law. You inferred that none of us here knew anything about campaign finance reform laws.

  4. #29
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    Is that still the case or does your answer depend on the outcome of what Obama does? #goteam!

  5. #30
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    lol. You said it was against the law. You inferred that none of us here knew anything about campaign finance reform laws.
    Well, I'll just assume you are lying.

  6. #31
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669

    The moment Obama were to make that comment the GOP would be all over that claiming that he directs the PAC and thus he is breaking the law.
    I disagree with the idea that the gop will go after him. They probably will be wanting to do the same thing with their PAC's.

  7. #32
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    I disagree with the idea that the gop will go after him. They probably will be wanting to do the same thing with their PAC's.
    Lol. Yeah the GOP wouldn't respond to something as blatant as that. And no i still don't think you understand campaign finance laws. If you would like i will link McCain-Feingold and the Citizen's United ruling and walk you through it.

    they don't do the same thing with their PACs because the Demo's would be all over that as well. Thats how politics is handled nowadays. it would be grounds for impeachment. Yeha they wouldn't pursue that...

    gmfb.

  8. #33
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    Sure go through the law and CU ruling. My point is Obama acknowledging he will work with Priority USA, and campaign with them and have his staff do the same-is that against the law?

  9. #34
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    Sure go through the law and CU ruling. My point is Obama acknowledging he will work with Priority USA, and campaign with them and have his staff do the same-is that against the law?
    Is he?

    What is your evidence of this?

  10. #35
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Is he?

    What is your evidence of this?
    foxnews.com said it. It must be true.

  11. #36
    Orange Whip? Orange Whip? Viva Las Espuelas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Post Count
    19,497
    Gloria Allred going after someone on a misdemeanor ll

    http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2011/836.04
    After this case I hope she takes on all rap groups that come through Florida

    what an idiot.

    Plus isn't that statute kinda sexist? I really don't care if it is. Just pointing out the stupidity in all of this

  12. #37
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    I am suggesting that if Obama publiclly starts giving directives to the SuperPAC or sends staff members to do so then there will be to pay.

    Use your pea brain for a minute. Your preferred talking heads are having you ask the question why has he not done this. Now why the would they aske that if he had already.

    You guys are clueless on campaign finance rules.

    Fuzzy is totally right this time. He's not allowed to even try to influence the super-pac. (Of course, if you believe that it doesn't happen, you might as well wait up for the tooth fairy - but that's another story.) Obama could, and should, speak out about some of the comments, and call out any political organization who accepts money from him. But that's not gonna happen.

    The main point is that the same nasty things were said about Palin, Laura Ingrahm, and others, long before this Fluke woman. The same exact words, the same misogynistic intent. And the people faking moral outrage over Rush's comments said nothing. What's the old expression? "Don't piss on my head and tell me it's raining"? These people don't give a about people who talk that way, or about women's rights or dignity. It's about getting Rush.

    You don't like Rush - I get it. Just don't expect me to believe it's raining.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •