Reply With Quote
It's precisely the right tree.
Your contention is that Paul is using technicalities to secure delegates outside the more democratic process of primary elections.
In fact, you are bragging about it. This is a good thing to you.
You are barking at the wrong tree. It's called Election rules.
Similar to Gore vs. Bush 2000 and the Electoral College.
It's precisely the right tree.
Your contention is that Paul is using technicalities to secure delegates outside the more democratic process of primary elections.
In fact, you are bragging about it. This is a good thing to you.
technicality
Yes, technicalities that undermine the more democratic process of primary elections in reflecting the will of those who actually vote.
Why do you hate democracy?
Again, you are barking at the wrong tree.
The rules are the rules and Paul is going by the book. Go whine about the rules to whoever made them up.
Pretty simple when you look at the facts you want to look at. You know why he's getting bigger crowds? Because thats what he goes for. While others are trying to get people to - get this - VOTE for them - Paul tries to get these rallies to show that he's a viable candidate.
Um, ok?
Congrats on winning the largest primary candidate crowd contest, I guess. That does not translate to anything meaningful.
But what is really showing regarding your and other Paul supporters delusions is your contradictory ideas that:
A) The neocons control the Republican Party and have shut Paul out.
B) That Paul will somehow be able to play "king maker" at the giant Neocon party.
People can convince themselves of anything, I suppose.
A) The neocons won't let Paul win
B) The delegates Paul has gives him influence at the Convention
not contradictory at all and pretty easy to understand tbh
I will bet anything you'd like that Ron Paul will not be a major influence at the convention. Romney can pretty much pretend he doesn't exist and still win quite easily.
Paul can't win the nomination by the simpler democratic process. In fact he's proved time and again to be pretty terrible at it, so he must use other means.
If Ron Paul's success with crowds is so high, why doesn't that translate to success at the polls? I mean if he's reaching so many people and they agree with him why aren't they taking the simple action of voting for him? He's not even close to winning any of these contests.
It's the neocons that are stealing primary elections but writing rules to give Paul delegates outside the primary process!
NEOCONS, I tell you!
there is no such thing. I'd advice you read up on the GOP election system. Everyone is playing the same rules.
The tens of thousands that wait for hours to hear Paul disagree with your opinion.In fact he's proved time and again to be pretty terrible at it, so he must use other means.
And Ron Paul is losing the most democratic part of it across the board.
The primary election results agree with that fact.The tens of thousands that wait for hours to hear Paul disagree with your opinion.
America is stupid. It's quite simple.
that is the least important part of this election process. What counts is delegates.
pretty much
Election fraud tbh, which has surprisingly been covered by Rachel Maddow a couple of times.
Yeah, fantasy delegate counts don't count either.
Which fraud laws were broken and by whom?
shhh don't you know Ron Paul is irrelevant. Noone listens to him.
Practically no one votes for him in the primaries.shhh don't you know Ron Paul is irrelevant. Noone listens to him.
People who hate Ron Paul are the types that think that everything is fine and the government never does anything wrong or never keeps from its citizens.
If you want to continue to see America do nation building overseas and making other countries hate us even more and also increasing the debt every minute with all the unrealistic obligations and goals that America has right now, then you shouldn't support Ron Paul. He doesn't support that .
I'd love to see Ron Paul run as an independent just so it would piss off all the Romney and Obama drinkers.
Your sexual fantasy imagery aside, Obama supporters would welcome an independent Ron Paul run.
Yep, 10-12% is practically nothing in these contests. That's why he gets little national coverage.
dumper, we all know that you're still crossing your fingers on that new car and house that Obama promised you back in 2008 when you voted for him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions