Shocker: phobes May Be Hidden sexuals

[mouse]

The fact that
"RandomLie" actually took time to do research and make this topic?


speaks volumes for many quotes to come.

[Wild Cobra]

My second thought:

Wide stance.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...=Wide%20Stance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Craig_scandal

Boston Legal in season one, episode seven, has Denny Crane being arrested for solicitation just because he took a wide stance and tapped his toe in a stall. Of course they did this episode because of the Larry Craig incident.

[Wild Cobra Kai]

Can we get some clarity on the issue of the meaning of the word phobia? Doesn't it mean the "fear" of sexuals? Why do people equate fear with hate? I've never known any human beings that were genuinely scared of sexuals. I've known people that hated or disliked sexuals.
People that are scared of flying don't hate airplanes or freak out when they see a plane in the sky. Just an example.

Hatred is almost exclusively a fear based reaction.

[RandomGuy]

I think you need to define phobia. This is ridiculous though.

In a college class, There was a study about boys who were molested, in large percentages, do one of two things: become gay or become very anti-gay. I don't think there is any way to scientifically analyze sexual community. Although I doubt you were looking for a real conversation anyways.

Good luck with your nonsense

In a thread about people who "doth protest too much" you accuse someone of not "looking for a real conversation anyways".


http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=193090&page=7



If one wants to "define phobia" there are plenty of places that supply definitions.

The study itself provides guidelines of how they measured at udes and so forth.

Feel free to read the study, and provide whatever feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of the methodology and conclusions you want to.

Since you seem to be the sort that doesn't read things unless he already agrees with them, and that leads to really weak critical thinking skills, no one will be surprised when you fail to do that, and just keep dismissing it out of hand, for no logical reason whatsoever.

[boutons_deux]

Hartmann confronts anti-gay leader: Do closeted gays run your movement?



In a Russia Today segment broadcast Thursday, progressive satellite radio host Thom Hartmann confronted Family Research Ins ute chairman Dr. Paul Cameron and asked him an unusually pointed question: “Does it concern you that many of your colleagues in the anti-gay movement may actually be closeted gays?”

“Um, no,” Cameron replied. “Very few of them are sexually interested. First of all, um… Most people are not interested in sexuality. There’s not at all. A few sexuals like to say — and they’ve been saying this now for at least the last seven years — almost everybody is bisexual, maybe some sexual…”

“I’ve never heard anybody say that,” Hartmann replied.

Cameron went on to claim that biologist Alfred Kinsey, whose groundbreaking research pioneered the study of human sexuality, “was gay” and “pushed that idea,” making his scientific findings somehow less valid. “Most of the sexual leadership… have pushed that idea,” he added. “But it’s not true!”

Cameron didn’t provide any source or research to support his claim, so interested viewers may just have to take his word for it.

what Hartmann keyed into.

“Who’s going to sit around all day long and think, ‘Oh my God, there’s gays out there! There’s gays out there! We can’t let them get married!’ And just, you know, commit their lives to stopping gay [marriage],” Hartmann said. “I don’t think about it that much. It seems to me that if somebody’s really obsessed with it, maybe we should wonder.”

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/1...=Google+Reader