That is considered life. The question is when does it become human life.
That is considered life. The question is when does it become human life.
You may not be stupid but you are certainly intellectually lazy. i didn't mention the GOP. As for something 'recent' how about the most recent issue of the Catholic church denying insurance coverage for contraception? You been living under a rock your entire life?
Its a central tenant of Catholicism that sex is evil except for for love and procreation. As the quote points out is been that way for a long long time. You ever read City of God?
Further:
http://psychology.about.com/od/zindex/g/def_zygote.htmAfter a female egg is fertilized, the resulting one-celled organism becomes known as a zygote. Once the egg is fertilized, the zygote begins a two-week period of rapid cell division and will eventually become an embryo. The zygote divides through a process known as mitosis, in which each cell doubles by dividing into two cells. This two-week stage is known as the germinal period of development and covers the time of conception to the implantation of the embryo in the uterus.
In most cases, each male and female sex cell contain 23 chromosomes. When these two haploid cells join, they form a single diploid cell that contains a total of 46 chromosomes. The zygote begins a journey down the fallopian tube to the uterus where it must implant in the lining in order to obtain the nourishment it needs to grow and survive.
The period of the zygote lasts for about four days. Around the fifth day, the mass of cells becomes known as a blastocyst. The germinal period will last for fourteen days, after which the embryonic period will begin. The second period of development lasts from two weeks after conception through the eighth week, during which time the organism is known as an embryo. At the ninth week post-conception, the fetal period begins. From this point until birth, the organism will be known as a fetus.
Within four days no individual organs have been developed.
As for your notion that laws that do not concern you are none of our business:
Do you need me to spell it out to you in simpler terms?
See the above post and and we have discussed this before. If you are going to claim that i am stupid or that i am making stuff up then you should at least point to something that demonstrates that. Examples of that include:
Claiming that there are no 1F capacitors but instead they were limited to uF when you work with caps every day.
Claiming that flywheels do not store energy when you work with generators.
Trying to normalize statistics from two different sets of data with an arbitrary function from a third data set.
Taking the last ten points of a data set that consists of thousands of data points and trying to make claims on the whole set.
Claiming localized combustion in the troposphere caused the Earth to flood such as described in the Bible.
Claiming that a sterilization program for the poor was not eugenics.
Claiming that in american justice there were cases of an innocent verdict instead of a not guilty one. BTW i am still waiting for an example of this.
That is just off the top of my head. What specifics of me do you have or are you just blindly throwing out insults. You say stupid as a matter of coure. Thats why i call you stupid because you demonstrate it time and time again. Its not just your occasional gaffe.
They're both contrived arguments, but I don't think the goal should be to justify or validate either one.
How many casualties have there been during this war? How many women have died during this war?
What's the difference between killing a baby that has been in a woman's womb for 2 or 3 months and killing a baby that has been in a woman's womb for 7 or 8 months? Why is it that the baby that has been int he woman's womb for 7 or 8 months is viewed as worthy of life and more important than the baby that has only been in the woman's womb at 2 or 3 months? Isn't that picking and choosing?
If a person opposes abortion, why does that automatically mean that they hate women?
Why do you like to build your questions out of straw?
[QUOTE
=AFBlue;5792896]They're both contrived arguments, but I don't think the goal should be to justify or validate either one.[/QUOTE]
Yeah but my point was the electorate, not people who are so involved in politics that we discuss it on a political forum.
I mentioned the gop because that is the op. The catholic church to my knowledge does not lobby anyone to outlaw contraception, just do not want to pay for something they believe goes against their beliefs. I believe they should have that freedom to choose what they cover for their health insurance.
"catholic church to my knowledge does not lobby anyone to outlaw contraception"
very hard to know that, since religious lobbyists/arm-twisters don't have to register as lobbyists. That's another privilege for the "warred on", persecuted religions.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)