Great Spurs article in today's NY Times

[therealtruth]

It would be nice to have a comparison of minutes per game in the season and playoffs the last time the Spurs won in '07 and recent seasons. I am sure there should be some interesting information.

[timvp]

You would think the Spurs would have won more championships over that period of time for being the best winning team. If that winning percentage held for the playoffs they probably would have. Over the past 15 years Pop's done a masterful job of winning during the regular season.

NASFs are amazing

[manufan10]

NASFs are amazing

What's this new acronym? I missed this one somewhere down the road.

[pgardn]

You would think the Spurs would have won more championships over that period of time for being the best winning team. If that winning percentage held for the playoffs they probably would have. Over the past 15 years Pop's done a masterful job of winning during the regular season.

Theoretically a 1 in 16 chance every year. so 4 is about right on the money.

[Spurious]

You would think the Spurs would have won more championships over that period of time for being the best winning team. If that winning percentage held for the playoffs they probably would have.

Yeah, the bum's .597 win percentage in the playoffs is just horrible.

[pgardn]

NY Times still rules I guess.

Except..

Perhaps Carmelo Anthony is on the way to establishing that brand of simpatico with Mike Woodson in New York.

Perhaps is way too definitive in this dream. If winning is to be part of simpatico.

[therealtruth]

NASFs are amazing

I'm not sure what NASF is but it wasn't a knock or troll just an observation.

[Marco]

NASF = New Age Spurs Fans

[Danny.Zhu]

Great read.

[PublicOption]

Can't ESPN throw this up every once in a while.....damn.

everybody email this to every "sports" radio and TV outlet you know.

[PublicOption]

Yeah, the bum's .597 win percentage in the playoffs is just horrible.

That's because in the playoffs it becomes 5 on 8.