http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=196176
It is well do ented jack that you will bring sexuality and male gentialia in your posts on a regular basis..
what is the leftis gay agenda jack?
I think I do. They want sexuals to vote for the left because the republicans do not like sexuals or any minority for that matter. Of course republicans do not feel his way. Like I said the other day, we were disappointed in you using a sexual slur as a insult to another poster. You a very well known democrat on ST and you appear to have problems with the sexuals or you would not have used that term " got" as a insult. But I forgive you. You are an emotional fellow and I want to think you were not thinking at the time(s). My point is not to embarrass you by showing your hyprocisy but im pointing out there are dems that use sexual slurs as well. God bless
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=196176
It is well do ented jack that you will bring sexuality and male gentialia in your posts on a regular basis..
what is the leftis gay agenda jack?
lol. I now work as an analyst for a major media corporation. I read a ton of really stupid stuff every day. That statement makes my top 5 list.![]()
Gecko scuppering the gay guy is sucking up to the "Christian" Bible-thumping haters who dictate Repug policies.
Yes, there are more important things to worry about. Having someone who is gay on staff is a trivial thing.
Glad to oblige.
Major media....
Yep...
I can see how that isn't a very good statement for the normal audience of M$M's.
you mean it isn't a very accurate statement.
Honestly, I had no idea what the he was trying to say.
English is apparently not his first language.
You shouldn't be. That was an awful straw man.
Eh, he could never say what the "leftist gay agenda" is.
Just another throwaway line.
Its not really stupid at all. It is 3/4th correct. Reagan allowed the Republican Party to be hijacked by the religious right. In order to win that voting block, they had to appeal to fundamentalist morons. , Goldwater was very pro-gay.
So the politicians preach the anti-gay rights message, knowing the have to in order to get elected, while a very large percentage of the Republican Party is not anti-gay at all, but accepts it because they don't want the country taken over by economic morons.
Its unfortunate but it happened. Eventually, as old people die, the fundy influence will decrease.
There is one thing about sexuals though. More so than any other social group, they have a complete inability to think for themselves. Ironic considering their sexual orientation.
Sincerely,
ter McGee
I do.
I told you already.
God bless
Bryan Fischer: How Is Romney ‘Going To Stand Up To North Korea If He Can Be Pushed Around By A Yokel Like Me?’
http://thinkprogress.org/election/20...-slams-romney/
this is down there with the leftist gay agenda
Link.
Throwaway line.God bless
I'm sure situations like the OP reinforce that view.
You're in the thread that has my specific answer to my brother George's question. One can only spend so much time communicated with you on any subject. I will pray for you that one day you will accept someone else's opinion and stop trying get people to agree with you in the annoying matter in which you do. This is not healthy my brother. Constantly arguing with people on the internets. One might come to the conclusion you have an addictive personality disorder. Im not saying this to hurt you, troll you, argue with you. I am saying this because you are my brother and I care . God bless
"Of course republicans do not feel his way."
Repug politicians MUST hate LGBT because the "Christian" haters dictate that position.
Now see Gecko groveling before the "Christian" haters by letting his gay guy go, then gay hater Fischer kicks Gecko in the teeth for being a pushover.
That's it?
OK, I accept your vacuous opinion as the best your feeble mind is able to produce.
And don't pretend to "care" when all you are trying to do is avoid actual discussion. It's insulting.
I'm proud of you, brother! Try to cool it on insulting peeps you don't agree with. God bless
Romney’s slowness to comment amid the noise since Grenell’s resignation raises questions about his principles, as well as the quality and depth of his leadership. That’s what should concern us most in this sad affair. We should expect Romney to go further in making clear that issues of sexual orientation will have no bearing on any personnel decisions he makes, whether in his campaign or, should he be elected, in the administration he would lead.
The Romney campaign should have spoken up publicly in defense of Rick against the attacks over the past two weeks… This was an opportunity to send an important message that Mitt Romney wants everybody to get behind him and to support his campaign. They let that opportunity pass.
In 1994, Moderate Mitt Romney promised to co-sponsor a federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act — and claimed he’d be a better advocate for gay and lesbian citizens than Sen. Ted Kennedy. But by 2007, Severe Conservative Mitt Romney etch a sketched his position and no longer saw a need for a federal employment non-discrimination law.
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/0...ks-on-grenell/
======
Gecko's highest priority is himself as President. He'll take ANY position, then take the opposite position, to further himself.
You should accept my opinion, hypocrite.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)