Simmons has had a couple of recent "oversights," including forgetting that he had made a wager on the MVP race before he decided to cast a vote for the MVP award.
http://www.businessinsider.com/espn-...-ballot-2012-5
Oops.
This column lost all credibility when he didn't mention that Duncan, one of the two best players in the world at the time and the best player on the defending champions, missed the '00 playoffs with a knee injury. An inexplicable, massive oversight, particularly when you consider that en route to the '99 le, they swept the Lakers.
Simmons has had a couple of recent "oversights," including forgetting that he had made a wager on the MVP race before he decided to cast a vote for the MVP award.
http://www.businessinsider.com/espn-...-ballot-2012-5
Oops.
He says the Spurs 07 team is a top three le team in the last however many years or so but they are on the list too! That makes perfect sense I tell you.
Just one fellers opinion but a good read nonetheless
His biases are transparent and open. That's all you can ask for. At least he doesn't hide behind..."statistics".
It is clear he hates LA LOL.......... He doesn't like the Spurs either in the finals it seems! To each his own (He did give the 07 a ton of credit, but they should not be on there all in all if he thinks they are that great).
BTW 07 Spurs are not our best team, I know that (05 was better).
lol @ Derek Anderson being thought of as a catastrophic loss. You guys think Bonner is a choker, Anderson was worse, except he was leaned on as a big scorer. Was a absolute joke vs Minnesota in that first round.
That said, give me all the lame, boring, asterisked championships you want.
Ill take another tainted on this year.
I agree, 2005 was a much more well rounded, deeper, more athletic team.
Plus in 05 Duncan did all he did on two bad feet. Battled sore ankles the entire last part of the year and playoffs.
Lmao at this nobody from some no name site rambling about crap.
This idiot says Parker was in his prime in 07'? Can he even name five Spurs not named Tony, Tim, or Manu from this years squad?
Say what you wish about Derek Anderson. The schmuck actually discussed contract demands the following day after getting raped by LA in the playoffs with the media..
..but, the guy had two of the NASTIEST dunks on someone that I've ever seen from a Spur. (Sean Bradley and Vin Baker)
Love reading Simmons articles and listening to his podcasts... Injuries happen every year, so every champion has to have a combination of luck and skill.
Too bad he went to Portland the first round exit team for years and never could stay healthy nor regained his form he had in SA that year in 01!!! I was never missing him once Gino got here, what a tradeoff that was from Derek to Gino! If we had Derek we are not the same team at all! I liked him that year but on his best year he was not near Ginobiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii! PERIOD.
I agree on that contract thing though, he had the nerve to mention Loyalty too a few times during that! LOL he cared about the money. To be honest, he was NEVER MISSED.
Yeah, him getting asshurt and signing elsewhere was a blessing in disguise. I don't see Portland games, but I do keep up with the season and I don't remember him ever being a sliver of an impact player with the Blazers. Injuries and braids IIRC that year..
I liked the above the rim mentality, (especially at a time where an exciting Spurs play was Jim's Spokesman Antonio Daniels and another one of his lame ass "Statue of Liberty" dunks), and the fact that he was a Spur endorsed by Jordan, (white and black 11's are STILL my favorite) but other than that, I forgot the guy existed once Manu joined, just like you and I'm sure 99.9% of us as well..
Pfft dunks..
Well, you know, that's just like, your opinion, man...
It's pretty sad how many people are unable to spell "asterisk".
IIRC, Simmons predicted the jazz and Knicks would give us and the heat all we could handle, even hinting at the Knicks winning. Dude's a good writer, but tends to make his analysis on paper. There's not a spurs fan out there who would take 07 team over 05, even with an injured Duncan.
Also, same as others have said, there are a bunch of other injuries / fishy calls that aren't mentioned in the article. But a lot of this is small market reality- if you win its because a big market team was 'unlucky', if you lose no one notices/remembers the same things happening to you (for ex., how is the havlicek injury he goes on about different from Manu's injury in 08?)
Unbelievable how the 06 and 02 * les didn't even crack the top 5.
This column deserves an asterisk.
In many sports you have to be lucky and good to win a championship college football comes to mind also.
Matt Bonner's career playof high games are 14, 12 and 11. Anderson's first three games against Minnesota were 12, 12 and 16. He led the team in assists in game 4. You don't know what the you're talking about, as usual.
yeah the officials wanted the Spurs to win.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)