Is your neighbor an Uncle Tom?
Not all blacks, my nieghbors kid is black & 6'4" & at 15/16 he cant dribble or shoot to save his life!
Is your neighbor an Uncle Tom?
Its really funnny to watch when the kids all get together & play!![]()
This is just stupid.
There is absolutely zero scientific evidence that skin color/race makes a difference in innate physical (or mental) ability.
Why is there a majority of blacks in the NBA? Why do Kenyans dominate the world of long-distance running? It's a cultural thing. It takes dedicating years of your life to the sport/activity to get good enough to even have a shot at being world-class. You either have to just love the sport/activity for some reason to be this dedicated, or you have to be in a culture that values and rewards being good at the sport/activity.
And yet, people continue to make that fallacious connection between race and, well, anything. Including being good at basketball.
I'm sure race comes into play, at least to some degree. There was a ton of selective breeding during slavery for developing more durable options.
You are a complete ing idiot. It is scientifically proven that blacks have far more fast-twitch muscle fibers. That doesn't mean all blacks have more than all whites. It simply means that evolutionary factors were different in Africa than they were in Europe and the far east.
Sure social and cultural factors come into play, but if you seriously think there are no genetic traits that are different in various races then you are an absolute moron.
Take a class in basic ing evolution.
Sincerely,
ter McGee
It has to do with slavery. Only the strongest survived, passing on traits to generations and generations. The whites were standing around giving orders, while the blacks were running, digging, lifting, etc. If you have any educational background, you know that that is the main case of discussion.
More stupid . Evolutionary traits take a of a lot longer to develop than a couple hundred years of slavery.
Sincerely,
ter McGee
maybe not...the black gene is a peaceful yet dominant gene throughout the universe. take a dark drink for example..let's say a 12 oz. can of coke...pour just a little in a gallon of natural spring water and watch the water turn color...It doesn't take very long for the dark gene to dominate
![]()
even though it was a horrible event..I can see how if I was white owning slaves could maybe be pretty cool...imagine today if you could force people (without compensation) to do just you didn't feel like doing...and then whip their ass if they didn't do a good enough job...I mean free labor which is like free money, free sex from the African women...and it was probably good sex too...that African pussy was probably way better than that white pussy back in the day...(the darker the cherry the sweeter the juice)...
a) take your name calling and ram it up your ass sideways, wad
b) try actually reading my post -- I didn't say there were no genetic differences, I said
And that is a true statement.There is absolutely zero scientific evidence that skin color/race makes a difference in innate physical (or mental) ability.
All of the bull that people throw around is committing the scientific error of starting from a couple of facts: (a) black people dominate certain sports, and (b) one can find genetic differences when you group people by race/region... and drawing the AHA! conclusion (which was the one you were looking for) that there is a cause and effect.
I repeat: there's absolutely nothing scientific connecting the two.
Humans have this need to make connections and see patterns and cause/effect, even if they're not there. That is why supers ions arise. That is why people look for "overdue jackpots" on the Vegas slots.
Because they arrived in Africa with a bayonet as a more efficient killing machine the Africans didn't have a choicethey were uncoordinated and wild...the white man would have killed them off through divide and conquor..did you not watch Shaka Zulu...
but the reality is that Slavery or indentured servitude was practiced the world over...not just in Africa...In the old countries of Europe, before the colonization of America.. there were many violent conflicts among Euro's over white slavery... there was no importance placed on whiteness...they got tired of killing each other so they traveled to Africa to start more killing....the people who sold other African as slaves really had no choice. They had no guns...or bayonets...The white man in historical context has been a real scourge on mankind...
This from my good friend Tim Wise...
• By the 1670s, the indentured servitude of Africans was on the rise. So to keep white European servants and black African servants from forming a rebellion against the power elite, white European servants were given certain privileges that black African servants were not, including
land and the ability to testify in court.
• A couple centuries later, during the Civil War, rich Southerners persuaded poor white people, who didn’t even own slaves, to fight by convincing them that their skin color was more important than their interest in a free job market.
and even at an early age little blacks kids are just more aggressive than white kids..I've witnessed it first hand with myself![]()
what is your problem...sickening way to treat people.
there is some truth to that statement...sports are a way out for blacks and a time killer to help stay out of trouble so they learn to excel at it...but blacks do have a fast twitch muscle that most whites don't seem to have...
Larry Bird worked his ass off and was better than many blacks in the league but he was still considered a stiff and un-athletic to a degree. But I do beleive that some people I won't limit it to race...but some people are just born more physically gifted than others and mentally smarter than others...it's all genetic...some kids can map the universe with their brains and some can't count period...that's usually a gift to be able to use your left brain in ways that science cannot understand not as much as it is learned.
Due to the smaller brain size and higher testosterone levels of black males.
we have an understanding...stop being so short minded![]()
Great article explaining the actual effect (not the propaganda lib professors teach in those left-wing indoctrination factories we call "universities.") colonization had on Africa
http://amren.com/ar/1992/01/index.htmlWhy is Africa poor? The standard explanations blame anyone but the Africans. Colonization by whites, it is said, kept Africa poor. The slave trade depleted the continent and impoverished it. Multinational corporations plundered it.
Just as blacks in America seek to explain their own failings by blaming them on whites, Africans explain their own poverty by blaming Europe.
To believe that colonization thwarted the economic development of Africa is to believe that indigenous societies were on their way towards prosperity but were brutally shoved off course by Europeans. In fact, African societies south of the Sahara that had not had contact either with Europeans or with Middle Eastern traders showed no signs of modern development. No pre-contact African society had devised a written language or had discovered the wheel. None had a calendar, or built multi-story buildings. No African had learned how to domesticate animals. The smelting of iron was widespread, as was fire-hardened pottery, but the continent did not produce anything that could be called a mechanical device.
At the same time, Europeans introduced two New World staples that could be stored — cassava and corn — revolutionizing the African food supply. The sudden increase in population more than made up for losses to the European slave trade which, in any case, ended by the middle of the 19th century.
It was trade with Europeans that introduced modernity to iron-age Africa. Far from hobbling and holding the continent back, colonization laid the foundations for whatever evidence of economic progress can now be found in Africa. It was Europeans who built roads and rail lines, introduced piped water, schools and telecommunications, and built national administrations. Nothing suggests that Africans would have achieved any of this on their own.
Read and learn, Kool. Read and learn. Stop reading agenda driven drivel from the Tim Wise's and the like.
not just black males but little black females too..I will say something you may find shocking...in fact I debated if I ever wanted to admit this but it..I think yall know by now anyway..
testosterone levels of black males is the same reason that white women and women of other races find them on average more attractive than a simliar white male..
but this testosterone is also what makes black women less attractive to white males...personally I find white women to be more attractive than black women on average...in fact I find black women (facial features wise) to be the least attractive on average of all women...but I'm not saying that their are no attractive black women to me because they're tons...but I think mixed races (white mixed with black or asian) are the most attractive of all races in my opinion..I think part of it is cultural...I never see black women in the gym either...most of them want to sit back and eat fried seafood platters all day...
I hope they're are no black women reading this taking this the wrong way...if it came out wrong I apologize..
Now THAT is some racist ass from the modern day KKK, aka American Renaissance.
Midget I'm way more educated than you and we both know this...let it go and stop frontin man...I lived in Africa for a year...it's a 3rd world continent we get it..By now you should know that Kool is the last person you should try to indoctrinate with your KKK storm front drivel
Don't insult me that way
What else does AmRan believe?
Totally not racist at all. Blacks and Hispanics are genetically disposed as intellectually inferior. No racism there!One of the most destructive myths of modern times is that people of all races have the same average intelligence. It is widely accepted that genes account for much of the difference in intelligence between individuals, but many people still refuse to believe genes explain group differences in average intelligence. This blindness leads to futile attempts to eliminate “achievement gaps” between the races and leads whites to accept the view that if blacks and Hispanics are less successful than whites, it is because of white “racism.”
Why was he "considered unathletic"? Because he is white. It's the same stereotype working in reverse.
If it's possible for you to look past skin color, you would notice that people like Larry Bird and Steve Nash are actually amazing athletes. They can do stuff that ordinary people couldn't dream of.
Furthermore, there are black players who aren't very athletic at all, and who make their living by being great shooters, by being willing to be defensive role players, etc.
The other stereotype people give white ballplayers is that they are smart and use their brains to make up for their lack of athleticism. Dude. Just look around the NBA. Some of the biggest dumbasses (coff Birdman coff) happen to be white.
A while back there was a do entary about race and the NBA. (Can't remember the name of it.) I remember them interviewing Steve Kerr (then with the Spurs) and he recounted how he'd sit on the bench with Antonio Daniels, and when a white player made a good play, Steve would comment "What an intelligent play!", and when a black player did the same, Antonio would say "That's great athleticism!". Of course they were being sarcastic.
Can't say I disagree with any of that. And the white man, as an ins ution, thanks you, the black male, for satisfying his women sexually. It's a great thing for the white man that the black male never evolved beyond his bestial sexuality, one that has him devoting his existence to breeding, like all animals. See, when the white man reaches a certain age, sex is no longer a priority. He's now more concerned with making money and running the world. Sex, at this point, is simply for procreation, so the white man can scion an heir who will carry on his legacy. The black man serves an important purpose keeping the white man's woman sexually satisfied so that she won't turn into a nagging, irritating and distract him from more important matters, like figuring out how to plunder Africa for even more of their resources.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)