Must be a joke..Spurs would never EVER do that....and if they did..I'd wonder if the Spurs front office lost their minds.
As much as the Spurs need front court help, no. You would be filling one hole in the roster and creating another. Besides, Gasol is on the downside of his career. Who knows what he has in the tank. Spurs fans were questioning Parker's resolve and heart all season. Gasol is no upgrade in that department.
Manu is retiring?
Don't know how the I left him off
in leet's scenario, the spurs really would be trying to become the new suns
The Lakers have to send a PG, otherwise it doesn't make sense.
The Spurs would fall apart without Parker. Ginobili and Duncan as old and going to be gone soon. Tony's all SA has left who's worth a on offense. Gasol is on the back 9 right now as well . . . maybe even on his last 5 holes. His career has certainly progressed 2-3 years past his prime.
Not a good trade at all. I'd gladly trade Splitter and Jackson + some other ass for Gasol though.
Spur fan thinks we need offense. It's always the ing offense. We have enough offense. We need defense in the paint that can also score and hit FTs. There's like 2 of those in the league. We ain't getting either of them.
No way I'd want to see Kobe, Bynum, and Parker on the same team. That team would be deadly to the rest of the West.
Do it RC.
send frenchie to meet up with his NATO pal Gasol and give me Bynum. The only Gasol i want on this team looks like and plays for the grizzly bears.
maybe for bynum
The Thunder geared their entire defense around stopping TP. If they paid him the same attention as they gave Gasol, then TP would have shredded them and probably averaged more points than Durant.
Spurs may have done this trade two years ago, but no way would anyone even consider it now. Bynum would have to be the offer to even start talks.
The offense choked in 2011. We needed offense then. Don't deny it. We need Parker for both ends anyway.
Gasol doesn't give us great defense anyway, Lakers fans are constantly bashing him for being soft. All it does is make our offense garbage and at best slightly improve our defense. We will have ball handlers and slow perimeter defenders. Or do you really think a late 30's Ginobili is going to keep up with Westbrook, Paul, Rose, etc, and have healthy ankles for an entire season?
If it was for Bynum instead, I might consider it. Gasoft though, no thanks. Parker is better right now, and will be better next year and the following 5 years too.
It's pointless to dump your best player for a player who might not even be your best after getting here. If we were getting Gasol as a free agent somehow it'd be great. It's just pointless if it costs Parker, our youngest and best core player.
Don't forget that Duncan and Ginobili are old as and will be gone in a couple years. Parker won't be.
This...can always count on you to be the intelligent Lakers fan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
