So based on your logic, since he didn't decline this past season from the one before, he's absolutely going to steadily decline over the next three.
Yeah, that makes perfect sense. Oh wait, it doesn't.
Also, if you think it's a "joke" they re-signed Diaw, then you clearly didn't watch many Spurs games and should probably not be speaking about them anymore if you care about people here laughing in your face for being a complete imbecile. Diaw was excellent on the Spurs last season. Most Spurs fans (if not all) considered him to be a priority re-sign along with Duncan.
As for "Toofless Jack", he has only one year left on his deal and is an easily tradeable asset.
Comments about Splitter/Blair/Manu were clearly garbage.
As for offseason flexibility, what point is there in the Spurs having any? Free agents don't go to San Antonio. Nobody who is a Spurs fan expects to get Dwight Howard or some . Spurs don't get prime free agents. Those guys all either go to the biggest 5 markets, or they will go to garbage markets for max deals they don't deserve.
As for the difference between the Spurs and Lakers, is that a joke? Intelligence? lmao. You dumb , the only positive difference in LA's favor is that they're based in LA where people want to go for exposure and movies, and have more cash to throw around because of it. That's it. Lakers have clearly drafted like utter dog 90% of the time, and 100% of their "good front office moves" revolve solely around them paying out a ton of money or getting interest from someone who wanted to make movies.
Your points are flimsy and weak. Completely devoid of competence.
Reply With Quote
