Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 36 of 36
  1. #26
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Post Count
    54,257
    The War Powers Clause of the Cons ution:

    [Congress shall have Power...] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
    Actual quote from the 2002 Iraq War resolution:

    The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to 1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and 2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.
    Key words there - "as he (the President) determines to be necessary".... this leaves all the warmaking power to the President, when the Cons ution clearly says it's up to Congress to declare and set the rules of every war....

    The Founders were VERY clear that they wanted every war to be deliberated in Congress.... Thomas Jefferson called that clause "a check on the dog of war," James Madison wrote, "In no part of the cons ution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war and peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department"....

  2. #27
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    The War Powers Clause of the Cons ution:



    Actual quote from the 2002 Iraq War resolution:



    Key words there - "as he (the President) determines to be necessary".... this leaves all the warmaking power to the President, when the Cons ution clearly says it's up to Congress to declare and set the rules of every war....

    The Founders were VERY clear that they wanted every war to be deliberated in Congress.... Thomas Jefferson called that clause "a check on the dog of war," James Madison wrote, "In no part of the cons ution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war and peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department"....
    We disagree.

    First of all, the [Congress shall have Power...] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; is not stated as an exclusive power. This power was traditionally the power of the Commander in Chief. There is the argument that this clause adds that power to the congress without removing it from the president. It clearly gives the power to congress, but does say it removes it from the traditional viewpoint.

    Please.

    Where does it say congress cannot delegate anyway? They do it all the time.

    Jefferson's intent is not shared by all, and that idea didn't make it to the written form.

  3. #28
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Post Count
    54,257
    If you search, you can find even more quotes from the Founders saying the same thing: the War Powers Clause is important because it delegates war declaration power strictly to Congress, where it can be carefully debated instead of pushed through....

    Considering you call yourself a libertarian, why on Earth would you be comfortable with one person having all the power when it comes to declaring and fighting a war?

  4. #29
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    If you search, you can find even more quotes from the Founders saying the same thing: the War Powers Clause is important because it delegates war declaration power strictly to Congress, where it can be carefully debated instead of pushed through....
    I'm sorry, but the "strickly" interpretation never made it to the legal text. Even if I agree with that, congress did delegate.
    Considering you call yourself a libertarian, why on Earth would you be comfortable with one person having all the power when it comes to declaring and fighting a war?
    Did I say I was comfortable with it?

    Quote please.

  5. #30
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Post Count
    54,257
    I'm sorry, but the "strickly" interpretation never made it to the legal text. Even if I agree with that, congress did delegate.
    How much clearer and stricter could it possibly get than "Congress shall have the power to declare war"? I don't think the Founders would have forgotten something as important as the executive branch also having that power if that's what they intended, tbh....

    And yes, Congress did delegate.... just because they did it doesn't mean it's cons utional....

    Did I say I was comfortable with it?
    The fact that you're so defensive about Congress uncons utionally delegating the power to declare war to the executive branch implies that you're okay with the President having that much unilateral power, whether you'd like to admit it or not, B....

    Let me put it to you another way: would you be okay with Congress voting to delegate their cons utional power to levy taxes to President Obama? Something tells me that in that scenario, you'd lose your mind at all the "socialist wealth redistribution" he'd certainly be doing, right? Congress giving up the power to declare war is no different than this scenario, tbh....

  6. #31
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    How much clearer and stricter could it possibly get than "Congress shall have the power to declare war"? I don't think the Founders would have forgotten something as important as the executive branch also having that power if that's what they intended, tbh....

    And yes, Congress did delegate.... just because they did it doesn't mean it's cons utional....



    The fact that you're so defensive about Congress uncons utionally delegating the power to declare war to the executive branch implies that you're okay with the President having that much unilateral power, whether you'd like to admit it or not, B....

    Let me put it to you another way: would you be okay with Congress voting to delegate their cons utional power to levy taxes to President Obama? Something tells me that in that scenario, you'd lose your mind at all the "socialist wealth redistribution" he'd certainly be doing, right? Congress giving up the power to declare war is no different than this scenario, tbh....
    I just disagree with your interpretation.

  7. #32
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Post Count
    54,257
    I just disagree with your interpretation.
    The people who wrote the do ent agree with my interpretation for the most part, so I'm pretty sure I'm right, tbh...

  8. #33
    Veteran jack sommerset's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    9,221
    It would not surprise me in the least if Obama lostb illinois. God bless

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •