Reply With Quote
Those with lack of gun control should be fired.
First of all, I never lectured on what a trained cop would've done in the movie theater but, what anyone, with proper training, would've done in the movie theater. It wouldn't have had to be a cop. In fact, as demonstrated at the Empire State Building, police officers may be less concerned with who is affected by an active shooter scenario than would be a CHL carrier, present at one when it begins.reading Yoni about cops spraying in the crowd is frankly sad after the lecture of how a trained cop would've stopped that killer in the movie with a clean shot...
Most officer-involved shootings occur outside a crowded scenario, when officers encounter a lone gunman at a crime scene or, occur after everyone else has either escaped or is injured and/or dead at the scene. At that point, there is little concern an innocent bystander is going to become involved no matter how far and wide you sling your bullets.
Secondly, I have no idea how NYPD's officers are trained, much less, how that training is reinforced and certified. But, that there were two police officers within 10 feet of the armed gunman and less than half of their bullets found their mark -- even in the absence of any return fire -- tells me, perhaps, these weren't NYPD's best and brightest. Just a hunch.
But, back to the point, I never lectured on what a trained cop would do in that movie theater -- and I'm skeptical of how well-trained these cops were.
Those with lack of gun control should be fired.
shooting a gun in a controlled environment is not the same as shooting with your life on the line and adrenaline pumping. Same thing as people who exercise with martial arts, when they get into real fights the training doesn't always matter.
Sorry, I don't by that. Part of their training includes not shooting innocent bystanders.
They recklessly fired. A moment more for aim is all that was needed. They panicked. I do not want a police officer with a weapon who panics. They definitely were not heroes that day. They are paid to put their life on the line. Not others.
I see manslaughter charges coming.
I disagree. The point of training is to make your reaction second nature in the event you're ever confronted with the situations for which you've been training.
For example:
Bystander Fired Deadly Shot, Not Officer
Now, that's gun control.Police say Perry Stevens was walking outside of the Auto Zone on Greenwell Springs Road when he heard Harrison yelling for help. Harrison was reportedly on his back with Temple on top of him. That's when Stevens went to his car and grabbed his .45 caliber pistol.
According to Col. Greg Phares, "[Mr. Stevens] orders Mr. Temple to stop and get off the officer. The verbal commands are ignored and Mr. Stevens fires four shots, all of which struck Mr. Temple."
Perry Stevens fired four shots into Temple's torso. Officer Harrison had already fired one shot into Temple's abdomen. With Temple still struggling with the officer, Perry continued to advance toward the scuffle.
"He again orders Mr. Temple to stop what he was doing and get off the officer. Those commands are ignored and he fires a fifth shot and that hits his head. The incident is over with, and as you know, Mr. Temple is dead."
Police are calling the shooting death justified.
If only 50+ movie goers had been armed, then we could have had a real serious slaughter in the dark.
You had a serious slaughter in the dark.
A couple of competent CHL carriers in the crowd could have made a huge difference -- just like one did, in the case of Officer Harrison.
lol anecdotes
Anyone who has experience in firearms understands this. But the (gun) haters will keep hating. They can keep hating and I'll keep carrying.
In "The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology," edition 86-1 (subscription needed) reported the findings of a 1993 nationwide survey of 4,977 households. The analysis found that over the previous five years, at least 0.5% of households had members who had used a gun for defense during a situation in which they thought someone "almost certainly would have been killed" if they "had not used a gun for protection." Applied to the U.S. population, this amounts to 162,000 such incidents per year. This figure excludes all "military service, police work, or work as a security guard."
I can't find a more recent paper but, I don't expect the numbers are anything but higher than they were in 1993.
lol anecdotes
I got some anecdotes!
Man accidentally shoots wife in bed
http://blog.mysanantonio.com/newswat...s-wife-in-bed/
New York Judge Censured For Approving Own Firearm License, Accidently Discharging Gun In Chambers
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...n-in-chambers/
Man accidentally shoots own buttocks at ‘Bourne Legacy’ showing
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/1...=Google+Reader
In 2000, 174 children (0-18) in the United States died from unintentional firearm-related injuries. Unintentional injuries are usually caused when children play with guns or are hunting.
http://www.childdeathreview.org/causesaf.htm
Last edited by boutons_deux; 08-28-2012 at 04:49 PM.
lol bot
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions