Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 37 of 37
  1. #26
    Tommy Duncan
    Guest
    Oh, it has nothing on that other "religion of peace"...



    A video grab image shows pupils and adults, as well as an object hanging from wires attached to the basketball rings, in the gym of the school in Beslan, Russia, which was shot by the militants during the siege and released on September 7, 2004. Russia's NTV television showed graphic footage shot by the militants who took more than a thousand hostages in a school in Beslan in the south of the country last week. REUTERS/NTV/Via Reuters TV


    A video grab image shows what appears to be a female militant in the gym of the school in Beslan, Russia where militants took more than a thousand hostages last week. The video was shot by the hostage-takers on the first day of the siege and released on September 7, 2004. Russia's NTV television showed graphic footage shot by the militants showing a masked and heavily armed man and a woman in Arab-style black headdress, as well as hundreds of hostages sitting in the gymnasium which later became a battleground. REUTERS/NTV/Via Reuters TV


    A relative of Madina Tamayeva, 10, weeps as she holds Madina's portrait during her funeral in Beslan on Monday. (AP/Alexander Zemlianichenko)


    Relatives mourn for Inna Kasumova, 16, a hostage killed in Russia's school siege, during her funeral in the town of Beslan, on September 7, 2004. Russian President Vladimir Putin (news - web sites) rejected any dialogue with Chechen separatists, blamed for at least 335 deaths in the school hostage siege, as hundreds of thousands joined rallies against terrorism. Photo by Grigory Dukor/Reuters

    Lest we forget,


  2. #27
    Yonivore
    Guest
    "No real answer to what? The fact that the Chechyan leaders where trained by the CIA in Pakistan and Afghanistan? The fact that W. recently granted asylum to a Chechyan rebel leader wanted by the Russians for acts of terrorism? The fact that even Putin is so pissed at the U.S. for meddling in russian affairs by sponsoring Chechyan and Georgian rebels, that he warned us that russia is still a nuclear power yesterday?"
    Of course, that 1/3 of the murderers are Arabs with al Qaeda connections means nothing.

  3. #28
    Nbadan
    Guest
    Of course, that 1/3 of the murderers are Arabs with al Qaeda connections means nothing.
    Of course, that 19 of the 19 hijackers where Islamic Jihad and not Al-Queda means nothing. We still gave over $2 billion dollars to Egypt this year.

  4. #29
    Yonivore
    Guest
    Oh please, al Qaeda claimed responsibility. Now you're just talking out your ass.

    Besides, all those organizations need to be eliminated...Islamic Jihad, Hamas, al Qaeda, etc...Who gives a **** where they were, they're all related and they all need to be killed.

  5. #30
    Nbadan
    Guest
    al Qaeda claimed responsibility
    Correction. Bin Laden himself said that he had nothing to do with the 911 attacks.

  6. #31
    Yonivore
    Guest
    Yeah, whatever, Islamic Terrorists never lie.

  7. #32
    Tommy Duncan
    Guest
    Of course danny boy believes what bin Ladin has to say.

  8. #33
    Aggie Hoopsfan
    Guest
    lol, now Danny's even trying to deflect the blame for 9/11?

    , BL sat there on tape and laughed his ass off at 9/11.

    So after all your other brilliant takes in the last few weeks, now you're telling us that AQ isn't the problem Dan? That's good stuff.

    I dunno if crack kills but it sure makes people like Dan talk out their ass a lot.

  9. #34
    Nbadan
    Guest
    Without ever doing a investigation, the administration had already sealed the deal on Bin Laden and Al-Queda's involvement in 911 thanks in large part to the mass media. So what did Bin Laden have to gain by denying that he had anything to do with 911? Doesn't make sense does it?

    Never mind the up to 1000 or more Al-Queda operatives that the administration claimed were possibly already in the U.S. planning attacks which could occur any time now, but strangely, or not, not during the RNC convention in NYC. A city that terrorists have already attacked repeatedly in the past.

    Then we have this statement by Cheney that only the current administration could stop future terrorists attacks in the U.S.. Makes ya wonder if Cheney knows more about these terrorists and their plans than he is letting on. Otherwise, Why would he make a statement like that? Oh yeah, to pander to public fear.

  10. #35
    Aggie Hoopsfan
    Guest
    So tell me Dan, what did the "non-partisan" 9/11 Commission say about 9/11. Get back to me please.

    Of course Cheney is pandering to the public fear. Not like the Demos haven't been doing the same.

    Oh wait, I forgot - it's only fair if the Demos do it. If a conservative does it, that's dirty pool.


  11. #36
    Nbadan
    Guest
    Of course Cheney is pandering to the public fear. Not like the Demos haven't been doing the same.
    The whole GOP convention was pandering to public fear, but then again, why go away from the one thing you do right?

    The Democratic convention was very positive. I don't remember any of the featured speakers using fear to influence public opinion. Except fear that the current administration might get elected again.

  12. #37
    Aggie Hoopsfan
    Guest
    Positive? All it featured was speaker after speaker saying "hey, John Kerry spent 4 months in 'Nam, vote for him."

    Gimme a break, pandering to public fear? I know you're asleep at the wheel, but the public in America feel that the nation's security is the single most important issue in this election.

    Damn George W. Bush for grabbing that bull by the horns, he should be bull ting about something that happened 30 years ago that somehow qualifies him for the presidency.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •