Oh yes.
The choice to murder.
I think you meant anti-choice.
Oh yes.
The choice to murder.
His position has always been he would not interfere, under any cir stances, with a woman's choice to get an abortion. And, he held this position when specifically asked about late-term abortions.
But, how do you square that in the context of women who honestly believe abortion is the taking of a human life?
Single payer would still violate the reservations of religious groups or people whose tax dollars go to the provision contraception, abortifacients, or abortions.
I think that's a reasonable position to hold but, it doesn't encompass all thinking on the matter and it's just as reasonable for someone to hold the position that human life begins at conception. It's certainly a more reasonable position than calling the fetus a parasitic piece of tissue, imo.
any woman that thinks abortion is taking a life shouldn't get an abortion.
/done
I think if the Left would ever recognize it is a reasonable position to believe a human life is created at conception it would follow that vehement opposition to abortion is a reasonable response to that belief.
Instead, they dehumanize the unborn child and call those who hold the position extreme.
Then they are so against the death penalty for adults.
Why is the death people OK for the innocent, but not the guilty. I never understood this.
Yeah, let them be born, THEN we can treat them as sub-human when their parents can't afford them and deny them social programs while lining the pockets of red/blue team higher ups while we're all distracted.
Poverty is the excuse for murder?
The death penalty is murder. Whats your point?
Thanks for missing the point. Your response suggests we should be okay will taking innocent human life post-partum, as well.
If it's reasonable to believe a human life is created at conception, it is reasonable to be vehemently opposed to all abortion...regardless of the consequences that grow from that opposition.
I'd rather work on solutions dealing with what you suggest than willingly allow the murder of innocent children.
more narratives... smh
I read news from everywhere... NY Times, LA Times, BBC, Reuters... I also use the google news aggregation quite a bit, which takes you to completely different places...
That you're obsessed with ty talking points doesn't mean everyone else is, tbh...
Like always, you completely miss the point and try to project the super vague "murder" thing on me. I never said I was for or against abortion, just pointing out that if a person has no choice but to have a baby that they aren't able to afford, they should be awarded proper benefits to see to it that the child grows up in a suitable environment and isn't eating candy canes for dinner every night.
But you don't care about people that are actually alive and struggling I assume.
Who are we to take a life of a criminal?
No you wouldn't. You've come out repeatedly as anti-welfare. You know who's on welfare? People with 8 kids that they can't afford.
at finding a way to shoehorn in this week's republican talking point
SBA List to launch Missouri ads against Obama on abortion
The GOP should make Obama’s extremist abortion position an issue
Unearthed Video Shows Obama Supporting Late-Term Abortions
Mitt is a guy I was considering voting for. And while I don't think he's necessarily extreme, he panders and looks subservient to the more extreme part of the party, while not even really trying to appeal to guys like me. So he hasn't earned my vote, at least yet. Neither has Barry, btw.
Mitt also looks socially awkward trying to connect to normal people.
A society that values innocent life and wishes to prevent a recurrence from at least one person that doesn't value it, to the point they were willing to kill.
That's who we are.
There was a trial.
Was there a trial to determine the guilt of a fetus prior to it's death sentence?
abortion is not a crime.
you drunk again?
Thanks for being too dumb to understand my point.
link please? also unless he specifically stated that you can't restrict a woman's choice until the baby crowns, then he isn't "as far left on the issue" as you have stated.
I square it by stating that based on their belief, they should not get an abortion.But, how do you square that in the context of women who honestly believe abortion is the taking of a human life?
So you approve of everything that your taxes pay for?Single payer would still violate the reservations of religious groups or people whose tax dollars go to the provision contraception, abortifacients, or abortions.
I would say that your idea that a group of human cells is human opens up far more issues than it solves, especially since I just cut my finger nails last night.I think that's a reasonable position to hold but, it doesn't encompass all thinking on the matter and it's just as reasonable for someone to hold the position that human life begins at conception. It's certainly a more reasonable position than calling the fetus a parasitic piece of tissue, imo.
Also
A fetus is, by definition, a parasite.
an animal or plant that lives in or on another (the host) from which it obtains nourishment. The host does not benefit from the association and is often harmed by it
^why are you so obsessed over unborn fetuses that you don't have any compassion or empathy for the living?(directed at WC)
Except people still kill people with knowledge of the death penalty. It deters no one and lets them off easy. It is also still murder.
What about those who were raped? Where is their trial?
Try as the anti-abortion/pro-life folk might, it is impossible to take the lives of adult women out of the abortion conversation.
My belief is that legislation intended to make abortion illegal, or illegal except in certain instances, or to otherwise remove and/or control a woman's ability to make decisions regarding her own body is inherently oppressive to women.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)