Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 34 of 34
  1. #26
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas A&M Aggies
    Post Count
    20,362
    Technically they were Big12 co-champs that season. That's how it reads everywhere. They aren't re-writing anything.

  2. #27
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    Post Count
    22,149
    Technically they were Big12 co-champs that season. That's how it reads everywhere. They aren't re-writing anything.
    Co-champs of the division, not the Co-champs of the entire conference. If any school did this, I would blast them.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ence_champions

  3. #28
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas A&M Aggies
    Post Count
    20,362
    While the team playing in the championship game is popularly regarded as the divisional champion, the Big 12 does officially recognize co-champions in football, just like it does in other sports. As a result, the following teams are also recognized as champions by the Big 12:

  4. #29
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    Post Count
    22,149
    While the team playing in the championship game is popularly regarded as the divisional champion, the Big 12 does officially recognize co-champions in football, just like it does in other sports. As a result, the following teams are also recognized as champions by the Big 12:

    South Co-Champions: Texas (2002), Texas (2008), Texas Tech (2008), Oklahoma State & Texas A&M (2010)
    Number of football les by school:

    Oklahoma: 7 (8 South Division)
    Texas: 3 (7 South Division)
    Nebraska: 2 (8 North Division)
    Colorado: 1 (4 North Division)
    Kansas State: 1 (4 North Division)
    Texas A&M: 1 (3 South Division)
    Missouri: 0 (3 North Division)
    Iowa State: 0 (1 North Division)
    Kansas: 0 (1 North Division)
    Texas Tech: 0 (1 South Division)
    Baylor: 0
    Oklahoma State: 1
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ence_champions
    Last edited by DMX7; 09-06-2012 at 09:05 PM.

  5. #30
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas A&M Aggies
    Post Count
    20,362
    While the team playing in the championship game is popularly regarded as the divisional champion, the Big 12 does officially recognize co-champions in football, just like it does in other sports. As a result, the following teams are also recognized as champions by the Big 12:

  6. #31
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    Post Count
    22,149
    While the team playing in the championship game is popularly regarded as the divisional champion, the Big 12 does officially recognize co-champions in football, just like it does in other sports. As a result, the following teams are also recognized as champions by the Big 12:

    South Co-Champions: Texas (2002), Texas (2008), Texas Tech (2008), Oklahoma State & Texas A&M (2010)
    Number of football les by school:

    Oklahoma: 7 (8 South Division)
    Texas: 3 (7 South Division)
    Nebraska: 2 (8 North Division)
    Colorado: 1 (4 North Division)
    Kansas State: 1 (4 North Division)
    Texas A&M: 1 (3 South Division)
    Missouri: 0 (3 North Division)
    Iowa State: 0 (1 North Division)
    Kansas: 0 (1 North Division)
    Texas Tech: 0 (1 South Division)
    Baylor: 0
    Oklahoma State: 1
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...ence_champions

  7. #32
    Not Koolaid_Man Homeland Security's Avatar
    My Team
    USC Trojans
    Post Count
    1,233
    The obvious interpretation by anyone who is not a postmodernist linguistic equivocator is that Texas A&M is recognized as a division co-champion, not a conference co-champion.

    It is part of leftist ideology to denigrate true achievement and elevate mediocrity. You see it everywhere from participation trophies to grade inflation to "you didn't build that." Anyone who claims that Texas A&M won the Big 12 Conference in 1997 or 2010 is a ing communist and not a true Texan.

  8. #33
    Not Koolaid_Man Homeland Security's Avatar
    My Team
    USC Trojans
    Post Count
    1,233
    Texas A&M should focus on actually accomplishing difficult things rather than rewriting past history to pretend they accomplished things they never actually did. That's like what black people do when they claim the 'Great Zimbabwe' was the equivalent of the Great Wall of China or that the Semitic ancient Egyptians were actually sub-Saharan Africans.

  9. #34
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    Texas A&M Aggies
    Post Count
    20,362
    Everyone realizes that claiming the conference championships is re ed. Saying that, I dgaf about all that anymore. If we were still in the big 12 then I might.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •