Reply With Quote
Duncan and Shaq tied 1
Kobe 3
DGAF 4-10
What?? Chucker Bryant ahead of Timmy D? Kobe gets carried, how is he #1?
Duncan and Shaq tied 1
Kobe 3
DGAF 4-10
Not in the top 5? Go back in ur in cave troll boy. Kobe is #1 no question, he is the most iconic player worldwide since MJ, most rings.. Accolades out he ass, too bad no player from the hornets ass franchise will ever make a list like this
Who had the better career - Dirk or KG? Mav fans here will disagree, but I think "The Big " had a better career than Dirk (and the same amount of rangs). KG is up there with the best PFs to ever play the game IMO.
Do you really have to open the thread to see Kobe is at the top? Laker fan will not start a thread if it doesn't somehow support his bandwagon bias. Just see the user name, assume it's some website drooling on Kobe's nuts.
Ironically most of these posers aren't even Lakers fans. Their leader has been outed as a Spur fan in hiding and we know him as Extra Stout, so any of you who've been dog nosing his asshole, the taco scent should have been a dead give away.
Stop being mad we got Dwight dawg...let it gobreathe dawg...breathe...
Hi ES. Did you officially go off the reservation or are you still trying to milk this shtick for all its worth?Stop being mad we got Dwight dawg...let it go
lol Extra Stout
1. Kobe
2. Duncan (over shaq since its just from 2000 to present)
3. Shaq
4. Lebron
5. Garnett
6. Nowitzki
7. Iverson
8. TMAC
9. Wade
10. Nash
shaq was past 06 so the 3rd place is fair for him, and if it was a list of top10 from 95' on, shaq would be the unarguable #1 with duncan as a close runner-up
1. Duncan
2. King James
3. Shaq
4. Dirk
5. KG
6. CP3
7. Nash
8. Wade
9. Kidd
10. Iverson
You're trying to hard B.
The Clippas are our foodstamp team. We give them a few foodstamps to go out and buy some hamburger helper and now their fans want to act like they eating real mac-n-cheese..You're trying to hard B.
Ungrateful lil bas s..
You can peddle this failed theory till the cows come home....it won't change the fact that we scored Dwight and you mad as about it.
Nash was just a nice throw in.
"They had the better pieces," Paul said. "And winning with the Clippers would be legendary."
Sure...I agree legendary...if it wasn't impossible
Even you agree now, good, good!
Solid list.
Where's Amare, knick fan and why isn't he ahead of Dirk?
Not a bad list. Kobe has 5 rings, an MVP, a couple scoring les, the 81-pt game, and most likely the most jersey sales since 2000. He also has the adoration of international fans whilst playing on the 2nd most recognizable sports franchise (Yankees first) in history.
Men want to be him and women want to be with him. He is probably the closest thing there is to a "God."
Good list, this will cause massive anal hemorrhaging among the haters
Since 2000...
Kobe without shaq - 2
Shaq without Kobe - 1
Duncan without Shaq or Kobe -3
If Kobe and shaq are both in the top 3 and were on the same team, how does the guy that did without either of them on his team not get ranked #1.
Should be:
1 Duncan
2 Kobe
3 Shaq
I'm not even upset at the list. I can see the argument for Kobe. I don't agree with it but I can see it.
Whats better?
A. Four rings, 2 MVPs, 3 FMVPs in a quiet, classy, city most young rich black males steer away from. A market David Stern hates and where championships will be scarce.
or
B. Five rings, 1 MVP, 2 FMVPs in a place most marquee players flock to. A market David Stern adores and where championships will remain abundant.
Are they both superstars? Yes. Then who won more rings?
That answers your question.
Also, Tim Duncan was bland and unmarketable to the average joe--meaning he was incapable of helping the game grow to a wider audience...in fact it was quite the opposite when his team went to the Finals.
Kobe won, and made it look good.
Youre likely trolling brah, but which superstar was in a better position to win? Is it easier to win four rings in San Antonio or five rings in Los Angeles ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
