lol proved
Because he isn't interested in them, you should know that. I posted the video for those who are civil and smart enough to choose to watch the video and then offer their own opinion without trying an attack-first at ude simply because of the one making the thread. And I did post the evidence, it's in the video.
Will you watch it Manny?
Oops, this 's legit. Here's another video explaining it.
Takes a bit of time to get there, but worth it in the end.
Wrong. If it worked, Dr. Burzynski would already be gone.
I've already watched my daughter play 10 hours of that. She doesn't understand why the cat turns into rasta cat after picking up the "little white cigar" (her words). not to mention the Quaaludes.
Maybe she shouldn't be playing this...
Wrong. When someone claims to have cured cancer, the very first thing I am interested in is if someone else has replicated his results. That would be the strongest evidence it's actually effective. That's simply how medical research works. I don't want to waste my time if that evidence is not in the video.Tell us where the part about others' replicating his results is in the video. I will definitely watch that part.And I did post the evidence, it's in the video.
Since you posted this at 10:12 and he replied at 10:16 I doubt it.
SA210 didn't even watch it.
Now you know how I feel when I post something that appeals to the above average IQ crowd and I seem to forget there isn't one.
Its almost like trying to get a room full of 4 year old's to fix a flat on a mountain bike its very frustrating to say the least.
Do you know if Burzynski's clinical trials have been replicated by anyone independently?
my comment was not directed at you, your one of the few that can go 9 out of 10 replies with something more than an insult.
But lets be honest that one insult puts you in with the Blakes,RandomLie, and RedZeros of the forum.
To answer your question I have not seen this film or have done any research.
I do know that the drug companies are out to make money, your health is the last things on they're minds. And if I had to put money on it I am 85% sure after watching the film and doing some research I will be right about my early assumptions.
The same could be said for Burzynski, tbh. Not having his clinical trials replicated is evidence that points in that direction.
Well until I watch the film and do some research (Agloco and others don't do) I will have no problem saying if the OP is dead wrong or you might be also I think i have proved that by now.
What are your thoughts on Michale More's Sick?
Coming from a person who had no problem siting through a 2 1/2 hour move called Lord of the Rings
Appreciate the civil discussion mouse. It's a good watch, when you find some time, give it a look.
I laugh at Chumps rules he always makes up, on what would make something true or not lol All the trolling of a video they never even watched, and it doesn't matter if they even watched it now, they would be determined to shoot it down regardless of what's in it. He's just mad because I owned him so hardcore in his Chump-Gate 9/11 thread, he can't get over it so he has to follow me around everywhere trying to get his manhood back
You didn't watch my video.
I actually did have a problem sitting through Lord of the Rings, and have never made it more than 20 minutes into the movie.Coming from a person who had no problem siting through a 2 1/2 hour move called Lord of the Rings
then I stand corrected.
Appreciate the civil discussion mouse. It's a good watch, when you find some time, give it a look.
I laugh at Chumps rules he always makes up, on what would make something true or not lol All the trolling of a video they never even watched, and it doesn't matter if they even watched it now, they would be determined to shoot it down regardless of what's in it. He's just mad because I owned him so hardcore in his Chump-Gate 9/11 thread, he can't get over it so he has to follow me around everywhere trying to get his manhood back
Duplication of results is not something I made up.Appreciate the civil discussion mouse. It's a good watch, when you find some time, give it a look.
I laugh at Chumps rules he always makes up, on what would make something true or not lol
It's the basis of medical research.
It's a fair bet that's why this doctor's urine treatments aren't approved by the FDA. Not some dark conspiracy. I personally feel that if I found the cure to all cancers using piss, I would spend my life making sure everyone knew how to treat all cancer everywhere. Anything less would be selfish tbh.
SA, there's just a little bit of filtering that takes place in the real world before I give up 2 hours on a youtube video. There are gazillions of yt videos declaring every conceivable breakthrough in the world. To ask for a brief distillation of your video is not unreasonable before dropping 2 hours on it.
That you cannot/will not supply that is telling, tbh.
No. I prefer to read objective scientific information from journals as opposed to watching 2 hour youtube videos because one form of information dissemination has a much higher level of credibility in the scientific community.
I would be interested in reading any information on any studies conducted by the doctor in question.
Trolls, the lot of you
Is SA210, Mouse and Cosmored the same person?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
