Reply With Quote
Pistons in 6 last year.
All these what-if's are making my head hurt.
Donuts. . .ahhhh
Pistons in 6 last year.
Sure, the possibility might've existed in a hypothetical context...
But that's a pretty thin limb to be walking out on.
People act like we didn't lose 3 other games to the Lakers, or like we wouldn't have to had to get past Minnesota AND Detroit last year, two teams that were playing at the same level as we were, if not better.
The Spurs lost because they dropped 4 straight, not because of .4.
I don't know. It would of been a dogfight with Minnesota, but winning against the Lakers may have given them the momentum to the le.
Never can tell. Thats the beauty...one must play the game to know the outcome.
Could the Spurs have 3-peated? Sure.
Could the Pistons have gone backtoback? Sure.
But, they played the games and thats not the way it happened. Spurs lost. Pistons lost.
Beauty of the game.
Sorry...havent been here in awhile...just pulled myself out of depression.
You could look at this another way:
If Horry's shot in 2003 goes in, and his shot in 2005 doesn't, we're still stuck on 1999.
I'll take what we got.
I'd take it too. So would the Lakers in 2002. If Horry's Game 4 shot doesn't go in, no way Lakers come back down 1-3 against the Kings.
Many championship teams have luck and breaks go their way.
Like Hedo, Brent was a liability on the offensive end untill the finals. So there is no point in bashing Hedo since through out most of the season and playoffs Hedo = Brent Barry.
i'll take what we got too, but that thought makes me :vomit
as for my opinion, rasho wasn't good enough to help our frontcourt get past the likes of LA and he wouldn't have been good enough vs. detroit either.
you throw in a shook hedo and you got the makings of a spurs le run that was going to end sooner or later.
but oh well, ancient history, WORLD CHAMPS 2005 BABY!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
