She's a of course, thus no case. Right m>s?
Explain why she doesn't have a case, counselor.
She's a of course, thus no case. Right m>s?
I guess you and the others are going to just have to wait and see, but do give us an update when you find out.
Mouse, you still got that copy of kim's daughter masturbating? that's probably worth something to the GGW guy.
Dude I already sold it ! Sorry I waited 2 weeks you never responded...my bad, you want me to try and find the guy on Craigslist and see if he will burn you a copy?
She could have a case against the guy who sold the photo's, but I don't see one against GGW.
Why not, counselor?
You know, I could be wrong. I am not stating it as fact. It's a real slippery slope if you ask me, if any purchaser of a product must verify every aspect of it. I simply don't think the courts, in the end, will require such actions.
She actually has s to show now...maybe she is looking for a playboy/penthouse gig. Search her name and the GGW cover comes up. Mouse has bigger s than she did.
GGW could easily be charged with multiple counts of child porn.
That said, a 14 year old girl shouldn't be hanging out any place where guys are filming them take their tops off. She no doubt was drinking with a fake ID was being stupid. She and her family deserve what they got and shouldn't get a dime.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)