Wow, that would be an even worse non-choice than the last two elections...
I agree, but that's what I'd guess. Hilary taking 4 years off to revive then throw her name in the hat seems like an obvious move, and Obama owes Slick Willy the world after his DNC speech, so he'd endorse Hilary over everyone else.Wow, that would be an even worse non-choice than the last two elections...
It would be just 2 more politicians who say whatever they can to pander to the most people possible.
I think the Republicans will get over their butthurt about Christie and run a Christie/Rubio ticket.
No idea who the Dems will have but it ain't gonna be Biden.
Tbh, Hillary is basically Willard with breasts, so she'd better hope another dumb , Jeebo -slurping neocon is put up against her if she's nominated...
Hilary 2016 and she knows it.
If the GOP has the same group voting in its primary, you can bet another Jeebo -slurping neocon will get nominated. I'm hoping we get the same clowns (Bachmann, Santorum, Cain, Perry, etc.) running 4 years from now.
R-Petraeus/Christie/Rubio/Jindal/Rand/Jeb/Ryan
vs.
D-Hillary/Cuomo/O'malley/Other random female(if Hillary doesn't run, which she will)
I wouldn't.
Tbh, either the GOP goes that route and essentially ends their existence as a relevant political party, or they grow some balls and nominate a principled conservative that could completely expose the Democrats' idiotic foreign and domestic policies...
meanwhile in bents in congress stay in power and nothing will get done the next four years because lazy assholes vote straight party since in the public's view, the presidential election is all that matters.
good job america.
well yeah....being 100% affiliated with 1 party for life because it's in your family's history is simply the American way. most people are stupid. obviously, people who think objectively are in the minority, and I don't want to come off as bashing US...it's humans in general.
At least that war-loving dumb Allen West got voted out...
That might be true. God bless
I think 2016 will probably feature names no one is expecting at all at this moment.
Rand Paul. If he is the GOP nominee in 2016, I will likely vote for him. If not, then I will be going 3rd party again.
I do not know why every Republican thinks Rubio is their guy --Mexicans are not going to vote for a guy just because he is Cuban.
Truth. Jeb Bush is more Hispanic than Rubio. If Jeb can get Colombo or whatever her name is to do some Univision interviews, that'd be a lot more effective than trying to pass a Cuban off as being able to sympathize with the typical Hispanic.
And count me in the corner thinking Jeb would have a decent shot. Mathematically, Old White Guys + Hispanic Uptick = 2016 Victory
Obviously overcoming W's rep to even get the nomination would be quite the challenge, though.
No American with the last name Bush will ever be president of America again. Dubya pretty much set that in stone.
Jeb Bush vs. Hilary Clinton. Let's get the dynastic alternation back on track.
ron paul will be a solid choice and he would've beaten obama already this year had the republicans nominated him not the mormon. paul is gonna be hale enough to make another attempt at the presidency 4yrs later imho, even though he'll be then turning 80 something
"he would've beaten obama already this year"
Tbh, Dr. Ron would have eviscerated every single Obama policy... the debates would have been epic, tbh..."he would've beaten obama already this year"
Ron Paul would have lost worse than Mittens tbh.
Rubio is heading to Iowa today. Coincidence or getting ready for 2016?
Jeb Bush/Marco Rubio
That is my prediction.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote