The Super Earth

[Wild Cobra]

I would suggest everyone watch Avatar again, except, that planet was probably less massive for the dominate species to be as tall as they became.

[lakerhaterade]

because the cleelatid of the masrik makes the oribital zolar a profound solar body. Zebulon 1351 is the pivotal point of nucleotides that circle the zone of gemar 5438762 plus the bit 0 times 70 year lights in reverse from gravity's bound detection and 700 million mph. But the comets falter at 7 kif for zilnitch

the ?

[DarkReign]

Well, unless they were physiologically identical to us along with their surrounding flora and fauna.


Edit: I guess I should say "genetically identical"

LOL. Yeah, there is always the "possibility" that life elsewhere will be genetically identical, I guess. That certainly would raise far more questions about the origin of life on Earth, or at least steer the conversation toward asteroids that carried huge amounts of water and other exotic molecules and elements. But, without such a discovery, if life had/has sprung elsewhere, it would most certainly point toward a Darwinian start to the process, if not the start, then certainly the evolution from single-cell to whatever it is we may find.

Personally, I think we will find bacteria that proves life is more abundant than first thought. That these meteors from almost-planet and even dead planets and stars, colliding, exploding and reforming onto other larger celestial bodies carry the necessary ingredients that terrestrial planets "typically" do not produce until it is introduced into the environment via collision.

That would mean, imo, two things. Life is quite random and dependent upon outside influence to start and flourish. But it would also mean the chances of life increase exponentially considering the age of the universe vis a vis number of asteroid belts and rogue planetoids moving at high rates of speed. Really, if every supernova or globular cloud were a sign of death, it might also ring the bell of life elsewhere after the area cools, condenses and spreads due to the ensuing gravitational fight between the remnants of the star and the now massive amount of debris orbiting it.

[mouse]

^ Good reply I take back the "you add nothing to the topic at hand" comment.


let me respond to it.

Yeah, there is always the "possibility" that life elsewhere will be genetically identical, I guess. That certainly would raise far more questions about the origin of life on Earth, or at least steer the conversation toward asteroids that carried huge amounts of water and other exotic molecules and elements. But, without such a discovery, if life had/has sprung elsewhere, it would most certainly point toward a Darwinian start to the process, if not the start, then certainly the evolution from single-cell to whatever it is we may find.

Not true if life found on another planet uses 60% of they're brain matter. Your assuming they think like we do, that they produce nuclear weapons and have to fight unnecessary wars.

Your leaving out the possibilities they are smarter than us and they not only know how they became but who they are and they have proof.

What are you, and all the misguided scientists going to do when they not only prove how the universe came about they know exactly how life on our planet came about?

How ignorant will humans on this earth look when they ignore an advanced civilization over some bearded pot head from the 1800s?

Your are still going to defend Darwin and Evolution after you have "real" evidence presented to you? I can see why "intelligent" life in other galaxy's would avoid making contact with us .

Personally, I think we will find bacteria that proves life is more abundant than first thought. That these meteors from almost-planet and even dead planets and stars, colliding, exploding and reforming onto other larger celestial bodies carry the necessary ingredients that terrestrial planets "typically" do not produce until it is introduced into the environment via collision.

If you really think all you need to produce a civilization of life on another planet is "bacteria" ? Then no need to debate any further. I don't have the time and energy to bring you up to date on the many elements and impossibilities that would have to occur in order for your theory to become fact.

That would mean, imo, two things. Life is quite random and dependent upon outside influence to start and flourish.

Have you ever seen a human pop out of the dirt? each one of us required a creator of some sort, sperm and egg was needed for us to develop our whole existence is dependent on outside involvement.

But it would also mean the chances of life increase exponentially considering the age of the universe vis a vis number of asteroid belts and rogue planetoids moving at high rates of speed. Really, if every supernova or globular cloud were a sign of death, it might also ring the bell of life elsewhere after the area cools, condenses and spreads due to the ensuing gravitational fight between the remnants of the star and the now massive amount of debris orbiting it.

Your assuming the texts books are correct on the age of the solar system when I have presented more than enough evidence its not.

What will happen when this advanced civilization we discover not only knows how we came about they know exactly when it took place?

Will that finally get the schools to re-write the science and Biology books? I think not,

The truth is the misguided Darwin worshipers are the most hard headed and ignorant people you will ever encounter in your lifetime.