it's the nba people.. the trade override feature is off (except for when the lakers are involved)
Andy Verejao? Gimme Gimme Gimme !!!
Irving is out for a month: http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/86...-broken-finger
cavs season is over - even more of a reason to trade for varejao; tank now and get a great pick for next season
^^ Cavs season was over before it began.
It'd cost you Kawhi Leonard and at least one first rounder. Anyone for pulling the trigger on that?
how about gortat?
yes I am, as long as we also include anyone else over 6'7" and we get another 6'1" shooting guard back in the trade then I am all for it.
It'll cost more than that... Andy is set to make $8.4 million this year... Bonner/Tiago would need to be included just for money reasons...
Cav can get at least a mid lottery pick for him.
The only way I would even be open to him coming to the SPURS is that he shaves that ridiculous hair off...I can't stand seeing that nappy floating around in the paint..Kinda hard to watch him play because of it...Plus 4 players for him?... that..
They won't take Bonner back, so it's Splitter, Leonard, and Joseph, Neal or Blair. Probably wouldn't need to give up a pick for that, but I'm not positive that he suddenly makes the Spurs better, particularly when Pop brings him off the bench to spell Duncan.
There is absolutely 0 chance the Spurs give up Kawhi for AV. So if you truly believe that is what it would take, then no point in discussing it.
^what he said.
Of course you don't give up Kawhi.
Splitter makes sense for Cavs - superb pnr player, 3 years younger than Varejao. Splitter, Bonner (for salary) and a first rounder should be reasonably attractive for the Cavs. I'd at least put it out there.
Andy WOULD be a game-changer for us. As Zach Lowe pointed out the other day, we get killed on D and the boards any time Tim goes to the bench. With Andy, suddenly that doesn't happen. Not only that, but we could play a true Twin Towers lineup against the Fakers.
I think the FO should be looking to get this done, and if not they should be offering a similar package for Ilyasova who has been strangely lost in the Milwaukee rotation given that they just paid him a big salary.
He'll go to LA along with Kyrie Irving for Steve Blake.
I never understood the Varejao man crush by some ardent posters on Spurstalk.
WTF? You would actually trade Kawhi Leonard aka our future, for an aging Varejao?yes I am, as long as we also include anyone else over 6'7" and we get another 6'1" shooting guard back in the trade then I am all for it
Varejao (including his contract of 9.1m/year over 3 years) is not worth Kawhi (2.8m a year over 4 years) and a first rounder. Kawhi alone, at his current level and contract, is worth more than Varejao.
I'd also argue that Kawhi's celing is higher than what Varejao's is (and Varejao's pretty much already reached it). But that part is a matter of opinion of course.
I definitely wouldn't make that trade if I was the Spurs' GM.
What the .
Did me saying "as long as we also include anyone else over 6'7" and we get another 6'1" shooting guard back in the trade then I am all for it" not tell you that I wasn't serious about it.
No, it didn't. Still doesn't actually.
Just made me think you have no clue about basketball.
Wow. we have to use blue text around here because some people just seem to take anything they read seriously.
You didn't say anything that would imply that you were joking. Don't know why you're getting upset for your poorly written joke.
it wasn't even a joke. blue text means sarcastic, I was being sarcastic, not joking. I guess you weren't around when people were using the blue text. It was meant for people like you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
