Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 80
  1. #26
    January Championship Banner? td4mvp21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    7,088
    I'm still a huge believer that Bonner's 1691 career 3PAs tell us far more about his playoff shooting ability than his 85 career playoff 3PAs, and hope we start seeing some increased minutes for him with the plan to get him more involved in the playoffs this year, and not less.
    Oh my god.

  2. #27
    Believe. Drz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    349
    Solid argument, thanks for the contribution.

  3. #28
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    The problem with Bonner is partly shot mechanics. He doesn't have a quick shot release. During the regular season, defenders aren't trying as hard to close out on shooters, thus why he performs better.

    It's true that Jack has a slow shot release too, but he also has a high release point, which negates some of the problems introduced by the slowness.
    SJax and Bonner in the playoffs shouldn't be mentioned in the same breath. One is the definition of clutch and the other the definition of choker.

  4. #29
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    The problem with Bonner is partly shot mechanics. He doesn't have a quick shot release. During the regular season, defenders aren't trying as hard to close out on shooters, thus why he performs better.

    It's true that Jack has a slow shot release too, but he also has a high release point, which negates some of the problems introduced by the slowness.
    I've mentioned Bonner's piss poor shot mechanics as one of the main reasons he can't excel in the playoffs numerous times before. What is your response to that Drz?

  5. #30
    Believe. Drz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    349
    What is your response to that Drz?
    1. How much less effective could that possibly be? Even if the team loses 5 points per 100 possessions, a phenomenally high number, he's still 3rd on the team, and
    2. if they play off him, great. The more 3s a team takes, the more often a team wins, IRRELEVANT OF 3P SHOOTING %. Seems counter-intuitive, but it's a true fact (per Hollinger).

  6. #31
    Less is More
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    2,113
    someone should post bonners 3 point percertange by month
    its hilarious how every year the exact same trend follows as april approaches

  7. #32
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    i take efkn bonner over gary

  8. #33
    Believe. Drz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    349
    I've mentioned Bonner's piss poor shot mechanics as one of the main reasons he can't excel in the playoffs numerous times before. What is your response to that Drz?
    Just went through your old posts by searching for the word "mechanics." You're right, you have said he has poor mechanics quite a few times. Maybe someday you'll decide to say what it is about the mechanics that's bad.

    Personally, I couldn't care less if he shot it by doing a backflip and bumping it off his ass, all I care about is that it goes in. You sound like the old school MLB scouts ... it's not about results to you, it's about if it looks good.

    Stan Musial died today. He had an ugly, ugly swing. Must've been a bad playoff performer, by your twisted logic.

  9. #34
    Less is More
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    2,113
    bonner has bad mechanics and bad playoff performances so your logic if flawed tbh
    somebody ban this got

  10. #35
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    And to think that we had Steve Novak on this team, let him go and kept Bonner. It irks me every time I see Novak and his quick, picture perfect release on NYK and think of Bonner's slow, ed to the side release. And it INFURIATES me when I think of Pop's man-love for Bonner and how it's kept Splitter on the bench up until recently.

  11. #36
    Believe. Dr. Robert Lee's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Post Count
    561
    Gary is fkn pathetic.

  12. #37
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    only thing gary neal the hero has on bonner is a quick release, everything else his fakn

  13. #38
    Believe. Drz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    349
    I'm going to give you a quick example to help illustrate my thinking. It's from Thinking, Fast and Slow, by Daniel Kahneman. Please read it.

    A study of the incidence of kidney cancer in the 3,141 counties of the United States reveals a remarkable pattern. The counties in which the incidence of kidney cancer is lowest are mostly rural, sparsely populated, and located in traditionally Republican sates in the Midwest, the South, and the West. What do you make of this?

    Your mind has been very active in the last few seconds. You deliberately searched memory and formulated hypotheses. You probably rejected the idea that Republican politics provide protection against cancer. Very likely, you ended up focusing on the fact that the counties with low incidence of cancer are mostly rural. It is easy to infer that the low cancer rates are due to the clean living of the rural lifestyle -- no air pollution, no water pollution, access to fresh food with additives.

    Now consider the counties in which the incidence of kidney cancer is highest. These ailing counties tend to be mostly rural, sparsely populated, and located in traditionally Republican sates in the Midwest, the South, and the West. It is easy to infer that their high cancer rates might be directly due to the poverty of the rural lifestyle -- no access to good medical care, a high fat diet, and too much alcohol, too much tobacco. Something is wrong, of course. The rural lifestyle cannot explain both very high and very low incidence of cancer.

    The key factor is not that the counties were rural or predominantly Republican. It is that rural counties have small populations. And the main lesson to be learned is not about epidemiology, it is about the difficult relationship between our mind and statistics. Our mind is highly adept at automatically and effortlessly identifying causal connections between events, sometimes even when the connection is spurious. When told about the high-incidence counties, you immediately assumed that these counties are different from other counties for a reason, that there must be a cause that explains this difference. However, our mind is inept when faced with "merely statistical" facts, which change the probability of outcomes but do not cause them to happen.
    Did you read that? I hope so. If you didn't, read it now. That small blurb could change your life by helping you understand how your mind works.

    I don't hope, I know that reading that blurb has helped you understand why your thinking of Matt Bonner is flawed. Your mind is trying to develop causal relationships that aren't there. The playoff performance is a result of extremely limited minutes and shot attempts. Nothing more, nothing less. To say you don't believe in this is like saying you don't believe in math.

    If you read that and truly, TRULY still believe in your old line of thinking, all I can say is you are stubborn and beyond hope. Kahneman is a Nobel Prize winner in economics. You are a poster on an internet board. Please, take some time to think about which person is probably right.

  14. #39
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    1. How much less effective could that possibly be? Even if the team loses 5 points per 100 possessions, a phenomenally high number, he's still 3rd on the team, and
    2. if they play off him, great. The more 3s a team takes, the more often a team wins, IRRELEVANT OF 3P SHOOTING %. Seems counter-intuitive, but it's a true fact (per Hollinger).
    They play off him and Bonner still refuses to shoot because of his slow release. It kills the spacing and they don't get more attempts.

  15. #40
    Believe. Drz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    349
    They play off him and Bonner still refuses to shoot because of his slow release. It kills the spacing and they don't get more attempts.
    If this were true, I'd agree with you. But other than commonly repeated phrases around here, and people saying stuff like "watch the games fool!," there's no evidence that he requires himself to be more open to shoot in the playoffs.

    Seriously though, kudos to you though for actually making an argument. I get frustrated seeing people post acious "duhhh, Bonner BAD!" comments with no evidence and, in most cases, quite obviously no clue what they're talking about. When someone comes along and actually makes a point, even if I don't agree, it's a breath of fresh air.

  16. #41
    Win. Whatever it Takes Whisky Dog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    6,052
    Just went through your old posts by searching for the word "mechanics." You're right, you have said he has poor mechanics quite a few times. Maybe someday you'll decide to say what it is about the mechanics that's bad.

    Personally, I couldn't care less if he shot it by doing a backflip and bumping it off his ass, all I care about is that it goes in. You sound like the old school MLB scouts ... it's not about results to you, it's about if it looks good.

    Stan Musial died today. He had an ugly, ugly swing. Must've been a bad playoff performer, by your twisted logic.

    On Bonner's shot: his poor mechanics stem from his form of hoisting the ball from just below his shoulder rather than releasing the ball from above his head like players are taught. The problem with this is although he's 6'10" his shot has the release point of someone approximately 6'3" or so. This coupled with the extra time it takes him to get the shot up from. This low release point means he cannot get off a semi contested shot from 3, and this is the type of shot that you have to be able to hit in the playoffs.

    This is exacerbated by the 4+ seasons of playoffs basketball that have shown Bonner to not only miss shots when the games get more important but also become hesitant to shoot when the moment is bigger. All together it means his effectiveness in the playoffs is greatly reduced and there is nothing but empirical evidence from 5 years of results to show this. You can keep trying to explain it away all you want but it doesn't change.

  17. #42
    Win. Whatever it Takes Whisky Dog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    6,052
    That said, props to Bonner and Blair for coming through when they were needed the most with Duncan sitting. Their efforts were part of the difference between a road win and loss.

  18. #43
    Veteran HI-FI's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Post Count
    13,358
    if Bonner's mechanics are not good for playoffs, how come Chip hasn't fixed it? Bonner seems like the type to work hard and improve these things.

    btw, I don't necessarily agree with Drz's crusade, but I respect it.

  19. #44
    Believe. Drz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    349
    On Bonner's shot: his poor mechanics stem from his form of hoisting the ball from just below his shoulder rather than releasing the ball from above his head like players are taught. The problem with this is although he's 6'10" his shot has the release point of someone approximately 6'3" or so. This coupled with the extra time it takes him to get the shot up from. This low release point means he cannot get off a semi contested shot from 3, and this is the type of shot that you have to be able to hit in the playoffs.
    I disagree with two bolded parts:
    1. He releases the ball well above his head (see pic below). He starts with the ball around his shoulder, but his release point is the same as nearly every other shooter.
    2. Playoff basketball is the same game as regular season basketball, albeit with more talented teams and (slightly) more effort. The bigs that guard him, at best, are only going to close out on him barely faster than they do in the regular season. I don't see how this could cause much of a dropoff in shooting percentage. It seems vastly, VASTLY more likely that the existing difference is due to the very small number of shot attempts.



    This is exacerbated by the 4+ seasons of playoffs basketball that have shown Bonner to not only miss shots when the games get more important but also become hesitant to shoot when the moment is bigger. All together it means his effectiveness in the playoffs is greatly reduced and there is nothing but empirical evidence from 5 years of results to show this. You can keep trying to explain it away all you want but it doesn't change.
    "5 years" of empirical evidence? You're trying to fluff it up to make it sound good, but you and I both know it's 85 3 point attempts.

    If you can prove to me he becomes more hesitant to shoot when the moment is bigger, I will Paypal you $50. You have my word.

  20. #45
    Believe. Drz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    349
    Per 82games.com, here are Bonner's "clutch" 3 pt stats the last two years. Clutch is defined as 4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left, neither team ahead by more than 5 points

    2012-2013: 0.419
    2011-2012: 0.500

    Not only is that not a choker, it's pretty damn excellent.

  21. #46
    Win. Whatever it Takes Whisky Dog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    6,052
    I disagree with two bolded parts:
    1. He releases the ball well above his head (see pic below). He starts with the ball around his shoulder, but his release point is the same as nearly every other shooter.
    2. Playoff basketball is the same game as regular season basketball, albeit with more talented teams and (slightly) more effort. The bigs that guard him, at best, are only going to close out on him barely faster than they do in the regular season. I don't see how this could cause much of a dropoff in shooting percentage. It seems vastly, VASTLY more likely that the existing difference is due to the very small number of shot attempts.



    In basketball the shooting release isn't only about the moment the ball leaves his hands, it's a culmination of the entire motion. If you look at tht picture you can see how he
    "5 years" of empirical evidence? You're trying to fluff it up to make it sound good, but you and I both know it's 85 3 point attempts.

    If you can prove to me he becomes more hesitant to shoot when the moment is bigger, I will Paypal you $50. You have my word.
    Maybe such little shot attempts is the sign that he becomes hesistant to shoot in the playoffs. You can point to all the regular season stats you want but it's a different type of pressure in the playoffs. So again:

    You can keep trying to explain it away all you want but it doesn't change.

  22. #47
    PRICELESS SPURS FAN polandprzem's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    16,433
    Nando is just the most turnover prone player in the NBA:
    http://bkref.com/tiny/y4PYx

    If he has a future in the NBA, it's as a SG not a PG.
    It does not indicate nothing as he played so short amount of time and still is an NBA rookie.

    I would like to see him playing more consistent minutes because now it seems like he just goes for every play to prove something.

  23. #48
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    2,238
    Harris and Korver took turns scoring on Green and he still gets a B, is he backed up by the church of scientology or something?

  24. #49
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    Just went through your old posts by searching for the word "mechanics." You're right, you have said he has poor mechanics quite a few times. Maybe someday you'll decide to say what it is about the mechanics that's bad.

    Personally, I couldn't care less if he shot it by doing a backflip and bumping it off his ass, all I care about is that it goes in. You sound like the old school MLB scouts ... it's not about results to you, it's about if it looks good.

    Stan Musial died today. He had an ugly, ugly swing. Must've been a bad playoff performer, by your twisted logic.
    I have absolutely no problem with someone having unorthodox shooting mechanics. Reggie Miller is someone that I will use as an example. He was a pretty darn good shooter that didn't have a picture perfect shot, but I don't care about that, because he was able to get his shot off in the playoffs and make it. Reggie was one of my favorite shooters, don't really want to admit that now after I have heard his commentating, but yeah, he was one of my favorites and he never had a perfect set shot.

    Bonner is different, he has a slow release that isn't accurate unless he has time to wind it up. NBA playoff defenses don't allow you to camp out at the 3 point line so you can wind up to shoot the ball. Bonner himself said that he was working on a quicker release during the off season earlier this season, which is the first time I ever heard him say that. You pretty much have no argument, Bonner obviously knows it is a big problem that was exposed in the playoffs yet again, otherwise he wouldn't have been working on it. He needs time to set and shoot, because when they run him off the three point line he becomes useless, as he can't get a shot off quickly, or shoot on the move at all.

    If you are a shooter, it's pretty easy to work out why Bonner struggles in the playoffs. I take it you're not much of a shooter?
    Last edited by Ice009; 01-20-2013 at 06:20 AM.

  25. #50
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    9,839
    That was one ugly win

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •