Reply With Quote
For once we agree!
No, he wasn't necessarily knocking your ideas. He was knocking your format. It was a long run-on blob without capitalization and tons of short hand. Plus, you never once pressed the enter key to space your thoughts out.
I gave up. Reading that messy format hurt my eyes.
So I neither agree or disagree with what you said there. I couldn't get through the post.
For once we agree!
we made a pretty decent project outta jefferson and he was older, i'm not pessimistic about bargnani. i'd be ecstatic if we turned neal into ross. the only part i don't like about my hypothetical is losing jackson. i think all this backup pg talk, is INSANE!
give me bonner all day long rather than bargnagnigni supposed abilities and his fat crazy contract
oh ya'll don't like the blobs. i'll incorporate some enter button in.
i don't know what short hand is, but i think i have an idea. and i'll try to watch out for it. can't help ya on capitalization...
i likes to keeps it informal.
Well it's definitely an improvement!
In all seriousness though, that post was very difficult to read. Spacing your thoughts out a bit makes it 1000 times easier to digest.
Not saying the Spurs want Barg.
Poorly worded le on my part.
Hence, usage of the word "connection"
I think they want a pg and may possibly get in on a 3 team deal. I think Cujo would be fine if given more time.
man, that would be almost as bad as bringing Jefferson back.
not just no, but no.
Bargnani is pretty much the last thing the spurs need: an inefficient, floor spacing PF who doesn't play defense.
worst thread ever
why spurs would do any other moves, we already sign baynes, and it takes times to incorporate new players, we have a good balance, a new interior who seems to have power and some rebounds skills.
i'm okay that neal bonner or blair doesn't play stellar ball but they do their job well enough as bench player, neal and bonner give us a range of 3 point shooter really important. and i think it will be really hard to find someone cheap whith great 3point shooting and defensive skills and whith the ability to learn all the systems really quickly.
At 1 M per year, Bargnani would be a bad fit.
He is making 10 M.
Stop making threads about this guy, please.
Is the hate on bargnani more of the price and performance or just performance alone?
His game is SOFT. I wouldn't even take him at a much lower salary.
Depends on how you define "performance". He puts up pretty decent numbers, and a few years ago that bought him some credibility, but time has shown that the numbers he puts up are completely inconsequential. At least inconsequential in a good way; the team's discovered that they're better without him, and he's making ridiculous money just because he happens to be a seven-foot-tall shooting guard.
Ice calling his game "soft" is probably the best way to put it. He provides nothing that his teammates can't do if he weren't there, and an actual big playing in his spot improves the defense.
Even the Italians are totally dismissing this guy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions