Reply With Quote
yep, at the BigPicture level, it's not horribly comlicated, not 1000s of songs to sing. It's the same old notes over and over, as tactics can be assigned to a handful of large categories, just like your blind ideology.
Aerosmith channeling boutons...
it's the same old story, same old song and dance, my friend
it's the same old story, same old song and dance, my friend
yep, at the BigPicture level, it's not horribly comlicated, not 1000s of songs to sing. It's the same old notes over and over, as tactics can be assigned to a handful of large categories, just like your blind ideology.
boutons_deux the sixites are over. Your liberal ideals are a joke.
Riddle me this Darrin:
How many times will the owners and developers of this pipeline ask the goverment to use eminent domain to take/use lands from unwilling landowners to build this?
Each state this thing is running through has more than one landowner suing over the railroading of their property rights.
http://www.google.com/search?q=excel...rchBox&ie=&oe=
Are you ok with the government picking winners and losers in just this case, or this and other cases?
Aside from those who believe whatever some far-left blog tells them, is the majority of the opposition to Keystone XL really about the pipeline itself, or about how the principals want to use expedited processes and eminent domain to get this thing built? If this is such a great project, why can't it go through the normal approval process and why can't the principals pay fair market value to willing sellers for the land they need to use?
I for one, am not opposed to the pipeline, but eminent domain is a de facto government subsidy to an industry and project which seemingly doesn't need one.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions