What if Kevin Garnett demended a trade?

**Spursdaone** · 07-05-2005

If Spursdaone was in charge of the Spurs management, we would be on our way to being the next NY Knicks!

If the spurs management listened to some of you nothing would change and age will take out the spurs.

**batman2883** · 07-05-2005

I think if he demanded a trade the spurs should be the first one in the line to get him. Just trade Duncan and he is ours.

Man give it up already, KG is nothing compared to TD, how does it taste, having KG's nuts in your mouth?

**Sense** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by TDMVPDPOY

how about spurs give wolves

parker
Gino
scola
1 draft pick

for KG

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

Are you sure you are a Spurs fan?

**Spursdaone** · 07-05-2005

Kinda salty

I like both players and they are both great so stop being so ignorant and give Kevin his props. They are close but Garnett is younger.

**batman2883** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Useruser666

Spursdaone is not a Spurs fan.

we have already established that last week when we compared stats and it still showed Duncan was better even if it was by a few things he was still statistically better. Spursdaone is on crack.

**Spursdaone** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by batman2883

we have already established that last week when we compared stats and it still showed Duncan was better even if it was by a few things he was still statistically better. Spursdaone is on crack.

You never proved about the stats. Garnett is the stat leader in the nba.

**batman2883** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Kinda salty

I like both players and they are both great so stop being so ignorant and give Kevin his props. They are close but Garnett is younger.

Ignorant??? No its called being smart, if it aint broken dont fix it, we all know TD is the main reason we win each year. We also know that KG is the main reason they lose every year, he chokes down the stretch, he has too much of a say so on who goes into Minny, most of the fault should be blamed on him for having such a mediocre team.

**batman2883** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

You never proved about the stats. Garnett is the stat leader in the nba.

oh man yes we did someone else had posted it and you complained cause you said the first few years of Garnetts stats shouldnt count since he came out of high school.

**Spursdaone** · 07-05-2005

Minnesota had to start with. Hudson, Wally, Nesterovic, and Peeler. They made a decent team out of that with getting Cassell and Sprewell but still aren't as good as what spurs have had and will have.

**Spursdaone** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by batman2883

oh man yes we did someone else had posted it and you complained cause you said the first few years of Garnetts stats shouldnt count since he came out of high school.

The last 3 years Garnett has been the stat leader so you are owned.

**batman2883** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

The last 3 years Garnett has been the stat leader so you are owned.

overall career wise TD has been the leader so that makes KG owned, and once again lets not even talk about the hardware.....Who is the two time league MVP back to back? Who has 3 finals MVP trophies, 1 all star game mvp, and 3 Championship rings??? i know KG has pretty much nothing in comparison with TD

**Spursdaone** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Minnesota had to start with. Hudson, Wally, Nesterovic, and Peeler. They made a decent team out of that with getting Cassell and Sprewell but still aren't as good as what spurs have had and will have.

Here is your answer to that

**batman2883** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Here is your answer to that

Here is your answer to that lame excuse, OWNED....KG IS OWNED. Overrated choke artist

**Spursdaone** · 07-05-2005

This site might help you to how much Garnett was better than Duncan in 2003-04. http://www.nba.com/statistics/2003/d...opic=0&stat=27

**Banks91** · 07-05-2005

lol yo spurdaone , are u still on that , bout statistics
Duncans last 2 seasons have been riddled with injury comin off playin in the summer
so his stats have been career lows

**Spursdaone** · 07-05-2005

You making excuses for Duncan about why Garnett clearly owned him. 69 games is pretty good in my opinion. Those 13 games were missed late in the season so he was healthy for most of the games he played during the season. Garnett is the better player now and Duncan having so many injuries is not a good thing for longevity. Webber had that same problem.

**Leetonidas** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

You making excuses for Duncan about why Garnett clearly owned him. 69 games is pretty good in my opinion. Those 13 games were missed late in the season so he was healthy for most of the games he played during the season. Garnett is the better player now and Duncan having so many injuries is not a good thing for longevity. Webber had that same problem.

Dude, STFU.

Tim Duncan is a leader. Kevin Garnett is a choke artist. Tim Duncan is a back-to-back NBA MVP winner. Kevin Garnett has won once. Tim Duncan is All-NBA First Team his whole career. Tim Duncan has been to the Finals three times, Garnett none. Tim has 3 Finals MVP trophies, Garnett has none. Tim Duncan has 3 rings, and Garnett has none. The Tim Duncan Spurs have 3 Larry O'Brien trophies, the Kevin Garnett Wolves have none.

There's some stats for you.

**ambchang** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Kinda salty

I like both players and they are both great so stop being so ignorant and give Kevin his props. They are close but Garnett is younger.

Duncan Born: 1976, April 25
Garnett Born: 1976, May 19

Garnett is almost a month younger, man, I am sure Garnett has much much more potential, he could win another MVP, 3 Finals and 3 Finals MVP in the next month.

BTW, please say "Hi" to ignorance for me, haven't seen him for a while, and I suspect he's with you.

**CalsonicKansei** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

I think if he demanded a trade the spurs should be the first one in the line to get him. Just trade Duncan and he is ours.

that, timmys better (i dont want to argue that now.) but I like the way things are and we don't need to trade timmy for Garnett. period If he demanded a trade for the wolves I think we got nothing for them. exept a couple of players. But I don't even like that idea.

**ambchang** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

This site might help you to how much Garnett was better than Duncan in 2003-04. http://www.nba.com/statistics/2003/d...opic=0&stat=27

Do they also show how, statistically, Bowen is better than Stockton on defense too?

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...&postcount=177

How does biting yourself in the ass feels?

**ChumpDumper** · 07-05-2005

Garnett is the stat leader in the nba.

Led his team straight to the lottery.

**Spursdaone** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by TexasBalla1001

Dude, STFU.

Tim Duncan is a leader. Kevin Garnett is a choke artist. Tim Duncan is a back-to-back NBA MVP winner. Kevin Garnett has won once. Tim Duncan is All-NBA First Team his whole career. Tim Duncan has been to the Finals three times, Garnett none. Tim has 3 Finals MVP trophies, Garnett has none. Tim Duncan has 3 rings, and Garnett has none. The Tim Duncan Spurs have 3 Larry O'Brien trophies, the Kevin Garnett Wolves have none.

There's some stats for you.

If you consider accomplishments as stats than Billups is better than Garnett. Give me a break about accomplishments. You are missing the point about how good Garnett. They are both great but you haven't seen that Garnett brings more to his team than Duncan. More rebounding, more passing, and more energy. It's to bad he is on a old team that would be last place without him.

**ChumpDumper** · 07-05-2005

They are both great but you haven't seen that Garnett brings more to his team than Duncan.

You're right -- I haven't seen that.

**ambchang** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

Minnesota had to start with. Hudson, Wally, Nesterovic, and Peeler. They made a decent team out of that with getting Cassell and Sprewell but still aren't as good as what spurs have had and will have.

Garnett's supporting casts have better stats than Duncan's supporting casts, so by your logic
Garnett's supportin cast > Duncan's supporting cast.
But as we can see from all the championships, Spurs > Wolves
Since Spurs = Duncan + Duncan's supporting cast (by definition) and
Wolves = Garnett + Garnett's supporting cast, we can easily derive the following:
Duncan >> Garnett.

**ambchang** · 07-05-2005

Originally Posted by Spursdaone

If you consider accomplishments as stats than Billups is better than Garnett. Give me a break about accomplishments. You are missing the point about how good Garnett. They are both great but you haven't seen that Garnett brings more to his team than Duncan. More rebounding, more passing, and more energy. It's to bad he is on a old team that would be last place without him.

What I absolutely do not get is, if you use Stats as the barometer, how did you come up with Garnett having a weak supporting cast?
But if you use your OTHER barometer in terms of the intangibles, why would Duncan, with his 2 MVPs, 3 Finals MVPs and 3 rings, be any worse than Garnett?
I just want to see how you put those two concepts together in one post without contradicting yourself.

Thread Tools

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions