GOP Congressman Suggests Second Amendment Includes Right To Own Nuclear Weapons

[TSA]

"GOP Congressman Suggests Second Amendment Includes Right To Own Nuclear Weapons"........for those who don't actually read.

[Blake]

The two articles were pretty much the exact same...

But in the end, they weren't.

Any time you're ready.

[Blake]

"GOP Congressman Suggests Second Amendment Includes Right To Own Nuclear Weapons"........for those who don't actually read.

Nobody really thinks he meant nukes, but this NRA dumb left himself open by trying to be a 2nd amendment champion.

In a follow up, he clarifies that there should be a line drawn, but like you, he's too much of a pussy to say where that line should be.

[Blake]

" Yoho says critics distort his views on gun control

By*Bill ThompsonStaff writer

Published: Friday, January 25, 2013 at 5:04 p.m.

Last Modified: Friday, January 25, 2013 at 5:04 p.m.

....A third Internet site, The New Civil Rights Movement, observed that Yoho "says the Second Amendment allows Americans to own all the weapons the U.S. Armed Services have. So, logically, a nuclear weapon should be included." ........

more:

http://www.gainesville.com/article/2...9707?p=2&tc=pg

[George Gervin's Afro]

gonna roll through your hood with a 50 cal turret mounted homie, whatchuuuu gonna dooooooo

Please roll through my neighborhood..

[101A]

If we're talking interpretation....

If "of the people" (entered right after an introduction that includes "Militia") can mean each and every individual, then "shall not be infringed" is much more specific, isn't it?

I've always wondered why that was so easily ignored, frankly - and surprised at some point someone would have proposed an amendment clarifying WHAT types of arms could be possessed without infringement. As it is, I could certainly see 5 jurists with a literal, original intent view of the cons ution throwing out ALL gun/arms regs.

[CosmicCowboy]

TP is quoting directly, but your great failure is to minimize this jerk.

"equipment" is extremely broad, and yes, includes RPGs and other explosives.

You 2nd Amendment freaks are perverting the Cons ution, not defending it.

We actually do have the right to own RPG's and explosives as long as they are registered.

[Th'Pusher]

We actually do have the right to own RPG's and explosives as long as they are registered.

Yes. They are heavily regulated and taxed. The question now becomes, should we heavily regulate and tax (not ban), other forms of firearms.

[Winehole23]

If we're talking interpretation....

If "of the people" (entered right after an introduction that includes "Militia") can mean each and every individual, then "shall not be infringed" is much more specific, isn't it?

I've always wondered why that was so easily ignored, frankly - and surprised at some point someone would have proposed an amendment clarifying WHAT types of arms could be possessed without infringement. As it is, I could certainly see 5 jurists with a literal, original intent view of the cons ution throwing out ALL gun/arms regs.

history militates against this interpretation. regulation and registration of firearms have been with us from the very beginning.

[Winehole23]

If we're talking interpretation....

If "of the people" (entered right after an introduction that includes "Militia") can mean each and every individual, then "shall not be infringed" is much more specific, isn't it?

I've always wondered why that was so easily ignored, frankly - and surprised at some point someone would have proposed an amendment clarifying WHAT types of arms could be possessed without infringement. As it is, I could certainly see 5 jurists with a literal, original intent view of the cons ution throwing out ALL gun/arms regs.

history militates against this interpretation. regulation and registration of firearms have been with us from the very beginning. the 2nd amendment and gun control arose together.

[CosmicCowboy]

Yes. They are heavily regulated and taxed. The question now becomes, should we heavily regulate and tax (not ban), other forms of firearms.

They are not taxed other than the ordinary sales tax. And the answer to your question is no.

[boutons_deux]

Yes. They are heavily regulated and taxed. The question now becomes, should we heavily regulate and tax (not ban), other forms of firearms.

The cost to society in $Bs and 10Ks death annually demands that firearms and ammunition MUST be severely regulated and heavily taxed to pay for the regulatory/enforcement costs.

[TeyshaBlue]

" Yoho says critics distort his views on gun control

By*Bill ThompsonStaff writer

Published: Friday, January 25, 2013 at 5:04 p.m.

Last Modified: Friday, January 25, 2013 at 5:04 p.m.

....A third Internet site, The New Civil Rights Movement, observed that Yoho "says the Second Amendment allows Americans to own all the weapons the U.S. Armed Services have. So, logically, a nuclear weapon should be included." ........

more:

http://www.gainesville.com/article/2...9707?p=2&tc=pg

lol logic. That's pretty much exactly the opposite of what logic would dictate.

[Th'Pusher]

And the answer to your question is no.

And what information did you use to come to such an enlightened position? A bumper sticker?

[Blake]

lol "I keep a copy of the Cons ution with me everywhere I go."

[CosmicCowboy]

And what information did you use to come to such an enlightened position? A bumper sticker?

The search function is your friend asshole.

[boutons_deux]

lol "I keep a copy of the Cons ution with me everywhere I go."

these text worshipers of the magic Cons ution are as ignorant, simple-minded, intellectually limited as the text worshippers of the magic Bible. and when you add in, "I'll interpret the text any old way I want to" (esp when it suits my emotional bias or income) you get really idiotic from these jerks.

[101A]

history militates against this interpretation. regulation and registration of firearms have been with us from the very beginning.

Obviously; just taking the words at face value...not all that relevant to a Cons utional discussion, tbh.

[mavs>spurs]

Please roll through my neighborhood..

for an inferior one wouldn't need a .50 cal, just a 22 ruger maybe even 22 rat shot

[Koolaid_Man]

Not worried bout a dam thing tbh...


Welcome to the Terror Drone Biotches...

[TSA]

Sadly many will believe he did mean nukes.

Nobody really thinks he meant nukes, but this NRA dumb left himself open by trying to be a 2nd amendment champion.

In a follow up, he clarifies that there should be a line drawn, but like you, he's too much of a pussy to say where that line should be.

funny you bring this up when I've asked you repeatedly to define excessive weapons and you've failed to do so. I've stated where my line is, I live in CA and deal with some of the strictest regulations in the country, and guess what, I'm fine with it. If I wasn't I'd move. I'm also fine with more background checks. Not sure why you're calling me a pussy when I've been upfront and you're the one failing to define what you're arguing.

[Blake]

What exactly am I arguing?

[Blake]

Ftr, semi autos seem excessive to me.

Explain why they shouldn't be banned again?

[Expert]

Yes. They are heavily regulated and taxed. The question now becomes, should we heavily regulate and tax (not ban), other forms of firearms.

Which state do you represent in Congress? I don't think Taco Cabana has any reps up there.

[TSA]

Ftr, semi autos seem excessive to me.

Why do they seem excessive?

And not a bad idea for you to change the direction of this thread, with luck maybe they'll forget what a ing idiot you were for posting some bull story you didn't even bother to read.