I meant a big Hollywood movie![]()
Speaking of cover art...
http://frankfrazetta.org/viewimage.p...tta_manape.jpg
I meant a big Hollywood movie![]()
I'd watch a Namor movie, tbh. I don't think he'd get his own le, though, it'd have to be a similar deal with Hawkeye or Widow.
What movie was that?
Hawkeye was in Thor, Widow was in Iron Man 2. Realistically, it would make sense to throw Namor into a Captain America movie (if you're putting him into the Marvel Cinematic Universe), or, if his rights went to Fox (or Sony, or whoever has Fantastic Four), a Fantastic Four movie.
Nobody wants to see an Aquaman or Submariner movie.
why is hollywood so interested in reboots, but wont add more or new villains into the story that has been made live-action, if those guys are popular in the comics and cartoon, i see no reason why they cant be in the movies....ppl just want something new to watch, not keep on watchin reboots being made from another directors angle...
I agree. I'm just saying I'd watch a Namor movie, for my part. For that matter, if they did an Aquaman standalone, and it were based on DCAU!Aquaman (Or Badass!Aquaman), I'd watch that, too.
I don't think Wonder Woman could carry her own movie either, for pretty much the same reason. Nobody gives a crap about Wonder Woman or Namor enough for them to have their own le, and Aquaman still has the joke character stigma the 60's cartoons hit him with.
Proto-pulp, but J.S. LeFanu, MR James, and HG Wells got well ripped off in "The Woman in Black."
I agree about Aquaman, why not a Submariner movie?
I'm surprised there isn't a movie about Warhammer yet tbh. There's a market and that franchise is all about epic carnage which is perfect for a blockbuster. The Warhammer Story is just a bunch of stuff that's been stolen before but what else is new when it comes to Hollywood
Hollywood needs to check out those old....WEIRD TALES...mags. So much great stuff there that is lost to todays audiences. Totally agree about Warhammer...good one!!!
Why is Submariner more interesting than Aquaman?
The same reason all Marvel-ites are more interesting than DCers. We can begin with the art.
The art of the comics has nothing to do with an imaginary feature film. Why is the story of Submariner more interesting than Aquaman?
First of Namor is a prince from Atlantis, second of all his exploits far more exciting than those of Aquaman. Now add the fact he simply looks cooler which is a biggie.
Isn't there something about Atlantis in the mythology of Aquaman? Why are his exploits more exciting? He kind of looks like a gay, underwater vampire. Is that cool?
I can't think of any gay who looks like a Superhero.
You've read the stories, real easy to see why Submariner is the better character, why play dumb?
Must see....
Ironman III
Thor
Hercules....starring The Rock...who will be the least muscular of all.
Sheessssshhhhh! so unoriginal!!!!!!1111!!!!!
Hey Avante, why do you do....0....and never originate any new threads?
I challenge you to come up with something right here all your very own, I don't think you have anything you could share at all. You're a leg humping leech and that is all.
Dude, you have nothing at all....ever?????????????
Jason and The Argonauts
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)