^irrelevant
ohhh stop huffing and puffing because you got your ass paddled.... So what makes a good coach? and whatever your answer is to what makes a good coach how can you say that Phil didn't do it better than anyone else given the ego's he's had to manage. That alone should get him the nod.
^irrelevant
You did get your ass lit, D.
tee, hee.
Weren't you trying to find a way out?
Notice you haven't mentioned Doc one time. Instead you and the other Post Pau alts have been red assed and piling on. The scathing truth brings out the roaches. Not one of you has offered a decent rebuttal.
Doc has an old team...minus Rondo...plus Melo has a date with Bron...
Go Melo
The . KG is no older than Duncan. Paul Pierce is no older than Manu.
You telling me Manu is better than Pierce or are you saying Tim Duncan is better than the entire Celtics team?
btw, didn't you quit already? You gave your notice.
Sorehead.
Quitter. You and ES have that in common, but at least ES is just trollin'
You can dish itPERIOD
So does any discussion actually take place or is it just trolling.
I think Doc Rivers is a good coach. Not great, but certainly not bad. He does know how to manage minutes and he's good at designing plays from an X's and O's standpoint. I know I'd love for him to coach the Lakes.
You sound like "Hank Kimble." lol.
You're a bit sore now. That's what happens when you call the election early.
Assistant coaches manage minutes, assistant coaches draw up plays. Coaches make decisions on which to use when. Doc is overrated. There's a slew of better coaches in the NBA, especially in the West.
Phil Jackson is overrated now?
black coaches are all overrated to different extents imho. they may have a good run in a season but you never expect a to achieve perennial success with your team like phil in chicago & LA, Pop in san antonio or jerry sloan in utah. it takes more than just basketball knowledge to be a successful head coach imho.
You have to admit "let Rondo pass up fastbreak layups to pad assists" isn't good coaching though.
As being the best coach ever... absolutely. As being a great coach, no.
It's well known Phil has been overrated for quite some time.
On to Doc:
Thibs is a better coach.
top 5 coach, yes. top 3 ego motivator, yes. Xs and Os,though? Despite what upstairs say I'd still take Pop.
Phil bailed out whenever his stars grew too old or too uncoachable.
Phil cultivated a career without challenges. Big ing deal. I don't see anyone going on about how great Sam Jones was, he has 10 rings.
1. Ugh, this thread quickly became overrun with Laker s who felt the need to rush in and defend Jackson. off, you rats.
2. Interesting take on Rivers - I'm not sure what to think of him personally, but why in particular do you think he should be fired?
1. He's been teetering on retiring to Orlando for a few years. That's a coach not committed to anything but getting paid.
2. He's played the painfully truthful role to the tee, but he's not played the good coach role worth a . Scratchy voice and forthrightness doesn't equal good coach.
3. He's a nagger, always nagging the media.
ST seems to have expertise in calling out coaches. I guess anyone can make a case in terms of play calling, but I'm sure the assistant coaches could make up for it if that were the case. Doc seems to be respected and has the ability to motivate the team. That's more than most of the league so who do you replace him with?
Rivers is a good motivator, he's not a good X's and O's guy, tbh..
He doesn't have an offensive system, Boston's offense has very little creativity, even with Rondo..Boston's entire offense with Rondo consisted of Rondo holding the ball and waiting for an illegal screen to develop in an attempt to pick up a cheap assist..
Boston's offense with Thibodeau(2007-2008 to 2009-2010): 10th, 6th, 15th..
Boston's offense post-Thibs: 18th, 27th, 24th..
Bulls' offense prior to Thibs' arrival: 27th, 15th, 26th
Bulls' offense since Thibs' arrival until Rose missing the season: 11th, 5th..
Rivers is the same coach that was nearly setting records for basketball anemia prior to Thibodeau and the Big 3's arrival in 2007-2008..
Also, for such a great motivator and leader, he did a terrible job handling Rondo and Ray Allen's feud..
Everyone automatically discounts the Russell-era Celtics because the league was so small them. In that case, why not discount the second three-peat Bulls for stomping all over an expansion-diluted league?
I think likehe's trying to get the most out of an aging core - and judging by how upstairs talks about him...
Okay, so he just isn't making a positive impact? Is he hurting the team in any way?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)