You're a member of the religious right. You're a bible thumper who's pro-life and anti-gay marriage.
Coyote...
Isn't it possible that each of those reasons affect different people differently, and that there are three times as many reasons to dislike Clinton over such an issue as Sanford?
I hope you aren't suggesting those three quotes of mine are mutually exclusive...
You're a member of the religious right. You're a bible thumper who's pro-life and anti-gay marriage.
I challenge you to find the posts of mine that support your lies about me being religious right. I am not a Bible Thumper.
Yes, I am pro life, and for traditional marriage, though I would like the government to get out of marriage completely.
What I'm suggesting is that your politics determine whether or not you care about a politician's sexual transgressions.
Interesting.
Please show me any post of mine that has me targeting Clinton for an affair. In fact, at least twice recently, I have stated he was a good leader.
Maybe you should seek a new job. The Cherry orchards are always looking for expert cherry pickers...
I'll get right on that. I'm sure you were posting on Spurstalk back in the 1990s.
I've seen you defend Christianity countless times on this site.
The pro-life movement and anti-gay marriage movement are both religious right movements. Without the religious right neither one would even be an issue in this country anymore.
Democrats should have never tried a carpetbagger.
FTR the RNC didn't help financially.
That's not very accurate. There are alot of dems who are for traditional marriage (BHO a year and half ago). But I see it as a lost battle at this point. Then again that might have alot to do with my view towards the issue.
ignorant, racist SC bubbas eat up this Bible-blabber:
Sanford: “I want to acknowledge a God not just of second chances, but third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth chances,”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/09/op...k.html?hp&_r=0
so unmarried Sanford is going to a lot more women now?![]()
That's a stupid thing for you to say. Defending other people's rights does not mean I am part of it. With your conclusions, I guess that means every time you defend a gay issue, you are proclaiming to be gay yourself.
you're nothing but a bathroom stall toe-tapping hypocritical got
What does that mean?
LOL WC defending peoples' rights to take the rights of others.
Christians have the right to never be offended by the buttsexxers
![]()
Wow...
Did you have to show us one of your favorite songs?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)