Is that so unreasonable though? I LOVED what Manu did last night, but how can I say he's been great this series after just one game? He was still bad for the first 4. There's nothing to reassess about it. First 4 games, . 5th game, great. Games 6-7? If he plays the same as game 5, I won't fault him for anything even if we lose the next 2. It would be impossible to.
Manu did seem done. He hadn't posted back to back "good" games since early March against two lottery teams. My opinion on that wasn't a knee-jerk reaction, it was a culmination of opinion based on how bad he'd been playing for 3 months straight. Until last night, Manu was 3/18 this postseason for having good/slightly above average games. The rest were below average to downright ty games. 3/18 is less than 20% of the time. Not conicidently, he's only played well 20% of the time in the Finals too.
I love Manu, but no one gets a pass for me because they were so great before. Dude is getting 14m a year and a lot is expected of him for our team to succeed regardless of his salary. He really did seem done and too old. Again. . .hadn't posted back to back above average games since early March (using the game score stat), and it was against two lottery teams (Kings, Pistons).