That's pretty sweet. Looks like something Dali might paint.
And I'm talking about the clouds although Dali would probably paint "weather wood" also.
My girlfriend's fiance is a chief meteorologist in Wichita City. Whenever tornado storms or hurricanes hit, she says he's got a "weather wood".
That's pretty sweet. Looks like something Dali might paint.
And I'm talking about the clouds although Dali would probably paint "weather wood" also.
I'm looking at it and I'm thinking water droplet. If the satellite is positioned between the sun and the earth, it would explain why there is a bright white color on one side (light from the sun) and blue-ish color on the other side (blue reflection of the earth).
![]()
Last edited by Notorious H.O.P.; 07-15-2005 at 04:45 PM.
Uh, if it were a water droplet, then it would be on the lense of a camera that was on a plane not a satellite. Since satellites are in space and stuff.![]()
Fair enough, satellite/plane, I haven't read how any of that information is gathered. But the same principle still applies. The idea served as a possible explaination of the "phenomena" or anomoly (see, you learn crap by watching Star Trek). But I had wondered about the whole satellite/plane business. The formation of a water droplet would be more likely in a plane mounted camera vs satellite mounted.
Maybe I wasn't clear before. Satellites can't possibly have water droplets on their lenses because they are in space. There is nothing in space, no water, no clouds, nothing. It can only have been on a plane based camera, if it was in fact a water droplet.
Hey! But I said star dust!![]()
That pic was taken over Sequ's place after a night of eating Mexican food with corn!![]()
![]()
That could be the top view of a hot air ballon.
...but UFO Guy is just freaky!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)