Reply With Quote
Why do black liberals side with OJ, tbh?
You know, that one guy.
Why do black liberals side with OJ, tbh?
Santorum lived in Pennsylvania and attended Ped State for a while so of course he loves raping children and supports those who do. Rush Limbaugh did it for the ratings, like he does everything else. I'm fairly certain that 99.9% of the child rape supporters were in Ped State at the time
trying to dispel racism, yet playing the us vs them card at every possible scenario
Defending Joe Paterno for covering up Big Dusk's crimes is an attempt to minimize what Big Dusk did, thereby it's a defense of Sandusky.
Glad you're admitting the right wing effort to defend Paterno.
Right Rush did it for the ratings. His listeners are right wingers and they're drawn by someone defending PedState.
"Stretch" doesnt even begin to define what you just did.
Just to recap, we've gone from "if you defend Zimmerman than you also defend Jerry Sandusky".
I know youre not that stupid.
Wow...one white conservative filmmaker makes a movie. I bet there isn't one black liberal or white liberal that has ever done anything that goes against the majority of similar people.
You are a hack. You are making false statements and lumping large groups of people together which is pretty ignorant on your part.
I never said defending Zimmerman = defending Sandusky, that's a strawman. Sandusky/Paterno were brought up by me because they're another example of the tea party/Republican tendency to lionize someone who did something wrong.
You've moved the goalposts away from Paterno after trying to say Republicans didn't defend Paterno and Sandusky. Now you're just saying they didn't defend Sandusky and dropped the part about Paterno.
No they don't. A few white conservatives doing this doesn't equal the majority of them. Ignorant and incorrect statement.
You still havent shown me ANY conservative who defended Sandusky. You just decided that people who defend Paterno are also sympathetic to Sandusky.
If you had said "the same people who defend Zimmerman are the same who defend Paterno" you could make a valid point. But grouping Sandusky in there is where your argument falls apart.
Plenty of conservatives bashed Paterno when the facts started coming out. Everyone turned on Paterno other than his family and this random filmmaker guy.
Before the facts came out about what he knew/didn't know, some people may have spoken out in support of him, but after the facts were released in the reports it has been pretty unanimous anti-Paterno.
Also the "I was gonna support Trayvon until those blacks made it into a racial issue!" is a bunch of BS. If anything, it actually proves that race rather than logic is fueling the decision to defend GZ (and the a million dollars donated to him). GZ in any other context besides this current situation would be recognized by most as a degenerate man-child.
The goal of the media is to keep people as divided as possible and to always remind one another how divided we are. Trayvon Martin case does just that, just like the OJ case.
Race is playing a big part in both blacks supporting Trayvon, and Whites supporting Zimmerman. It is not just the Zimmerman side that is fueled by race.
Like I said before, I don't have a side in this case and will form my opinion during or after the trial once all the facts are reviewed. I just gave my opinion as to why some whites are backing Zimmerman so staunchly.
That's because they are whether or not they want to admit it. The fact they're more bothered by the Freeh Report than they are kids who's lives were ruined by Jerry Sandusky is evidence of their at ude toward's Sandusky's repeated child molestation.
As far as a conservative who directly defended the tickle monster, John Zeigler said the case against Sandusky was weak, while he gave Sandusky multiple interviews from prison to tell his story. That sounds like someone who wants to defend Sandusky.
Look how few posts it took before you began trying to defend those who defend Paterno
So whether or not you agree on the Sandusky part, now you're admitting the recurring trend of right wingers defending Paterno?
Sounds like your issue is with this Zeigler character and not white conservatives as a whole.
It's not just Ziegler. I already gave other examples of Conservatives. For example, Rick Santorum in 2002, after multiple kids had already alleged that Sandusky molested them but just weren't , nominated Sandusky for a congressional award.
How/When did i defend anyone who defended paterno? Paterno can rot in as can anyone who defended him.
Look how few posts it took before you began trying to defend those who defend Paterno
Your leaps in logic are absurd.
You defended them with your attempts to splinter Paterno defenders from Sandusky defenders.
Rick Santorum is an idiot. You are still committing a fallacy by lumping white conservatives together an issue with no proof other than a couple radical people that somewhat fall in the group.It's not just Ziegler. I already gave other examples of Conservatives. For example, Rick Santorum in 2002, after multiple kids had already alleged that Sandusky molested them but just weren't , nominated Sandusky for a congressional award
You really should quit arguing because you seem dumber with each post.
Well close to four million conservatives voted for him in the 2012 primary, so that's four million conservatives who apparently aren't very bothered by Santorum's admiration for Sandusky
The attempts to call Santorum radical are hilarious. He came in 2nd place in the Republican primary and gave Willard the biggest challenge in spite of Willard having a lot more campaign funds to play with. He's not radical at all compared to the modern day Republican party.
They can rot in as can anyone who defended either of them.
The "guilt by association" youre attempting is a very basic logical fallacy that you dont seem to be able to understand.
What you are attempting is literally a text-book case of a logical fallacy.Rick Santorum defended Paterno
Rick Santorum is a conservative
All conservatives defended Paterno
Youre not even allowed to do this:
Making that "jump" is also a logical fallacy.Some conservatives defended Paterno
Most conservatives defended Zimmerman
Most/All conservatives defended Paterno
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions